CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

$9736.22 of $21422.68
left sidedonated so farneed $11686.46 donated to reach our goalright side, our goal
Help CastleCops serve the community on new servers, Donate Here to reach our goal.

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
Survey
spacer
Was 2007 a good year?

Yes it was a wonderful year
Yes, but there is always room for improvement
Status quo
It was a challenge
Other (leave comment)



Results
Polls

Votes: 940
Comments: 25
block bottom
spacer spacer
image Security HeadLines: Is SSL safe? image
Networks
Johnny-B-Goode writes "By John Leyden
Posted: 21/03/2003 at 12:42 GMT


Czech security researchers this week claimed to have uncovered weaknesses in SSL that might permit crackers to decypher transmissions over supposedly secure links.

However, independent cryptography experts, who are studying a paper from Czech security outfit ICZ, are yet to verify the risk is real and as serious as ICZ suggests - so the research needs to be treated with caution.

A press release issued on behalf of Czech cryptologists Vlastimil Klíma and Tomá? Rosa, both of ICZ, and Ondrej Pokorný, paints a picture of severe problems with the SSL protocol. It states:

The weakness identified by the cryptologists makes it possible to attack the SSL/TLS (Secure Sockets Layer and Transport Layer Security) protocols used as a cryptographic protection of a majority of electronic transactions, such as on-line purchases and e-banking, and, in some cases, a secured transmission of e-mails as well.

An attack on these protocols, as described by the team of Czech cryptologists, can break through the protection completely and decrypt protected communication. This means for clients using applications relying on SSL/TLS protocols that an attacker is able to retrieve their credit card numbers, sensitive information about their bank accounts and misuse confidential data from their e-mails.

Lordy.



From the press release and an abstract of their paper we learn that the researchers have uncovered a possible means of obtaining cryptographic keys from a server and thereby unlocking the contents of a captured session. This side-channel attack, which builds on previous research, is explained in detail in the trio's paper, which you can read here (PDF).

The Czechs found two thirds of randomly chosen Internet SSL/TLS servers were vulnerable to the attack they document. Improvements to SSL are put forward in the paper, which, drawing as it does on complex mathematical analysis, doesn't lend itself to distillation into a news story.

So how great a risk does the attack present to e-commerce transactions?

To answer this question we contacted noted cryptographer Bruce Schneier, CTO of Counterpane Systems. Schneier wasn't available to provide an immediate response but told us he would be looking into the issue. We'll let you know what he comes up with.

A month ago Swiss security researchers discovered an attack against implementations of the ubiquitous SSL protocol that could potentially compromise email passwords, though not ecommerce transactions.

Writing about this attack in his Cryptogram newsletter, Schneier says users should be more concerned about their credit cards been lifted from insecure servers - rather than snapped up in transit, using either the Swiss or Czech attacks.

The real risks to personal data are the large databases at the endpoints, not the communications between them. I wouldn't discard SSL as being irrelevant, but neither would I worry very much if it could be attacked. Security is only as strong as the weakest link, and SSL is nowhere close to being the weakest link, he writes. ®

Press Release;
http://www.i.cz/en/onas/tisk7.html

Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2003/052;
http://eprint.iacr.org/2003/052/

PDF link;
http://eprint.iacr.org/2003/052.pdf

Crytogram newletter
http://www.counterpane.com./crypto-gram-0303.html#3


Article and source
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/29868.html

"
Posted on Friday, 21 March 2003 @ 20:51:12 UTC by Paul (1250 reads)
[ Trackback ]
image

"Security HeadLines: Is SSL safe?" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register
 
Login
spacer
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Type Security Code: Usage signifies AUP acceptance
· New User? · Click here to create a registered account.
block bottom
Related Links
spacer
· del.icio.us!
· digg it!
· reddit!
· TrackBack (0)
· SuSE
· HotScripts
· W3 Consortium
· More about Networks
· News by Paul


Most read story about Networks:
Network Troubleshooting 101 – Part 1

block bottom
Article Rating
spacer
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


block bottom
Options
spacer

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

block bottom
spacer spacer