CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

$9736.22 of $21422.68
left sidedonated so farneed $11686.46 donated to reach our goalright side, our goal
Help CastleCops serve the community on new servers, Donate Here to reach our goal.

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
Survey
spacer
Was 2007 a good year?

Yes it was a wonderful year
Yes, but there is always room for improvement
Status quo
It was a challenge
Other (leave comment)



Results
Polls

Votes: 949
Comments: 28
block bottom
spacer spacer
image R U Ready 4 IM Spam? image
SPAM
It seems likely, but it's not inevitable -- if the IM vendors take the long view

By Jimmy Guterman

On the Net, media and marketing companies are like the stormtroopers in the original Star Wars. They find a means of distribution, suck out its value until there's nothing left, and move on to the next one. Usenet is gone as a useful distribution medium, thanks to incessant spam. Unwanted e-mail advertising is such a plague that an entire industry is coalescing around the development of tools that filter it out. And website ads are getting so intrusive (pop-ups, unnaturally large ads, interstitials, and all flavors of dancing baloney) that many people I know turn off all images on their browsers. They'll skip some useful and entertaining stuff because the unwanted material is so annoying or offensive. [more...]

The stormtroopers of marketing may be about to strike again. Their target this time: instant messaging.

It's easy to see why. Research firm Gartner estimates that 66 million people use the three most popular programs (AIM, MSN, and Yahoo (YHOO)). All those vendors sell "secure" versions for corporate use, and IBM (IBM), to name just one provider of corporate IM services, reports that 7 million people are using its Sametime system. At companies for which e-mail isn't fast enough, instant messaging has become the preferred form of online communication.

Tens of millions of customers using an extremely intrusive online application? That's a marketer's dream. We've already seen interesting -- and far from annoying -- attempts to use IM programs as a new means of media distribution. Some have been provocative and amusing, like Aimster. Others, like a news service from the Wall Street Journal, have sought to use instant messaging to distribute the sort of information (headlines, stock quotes, etc.) that we're used to seeing in e-mail and on webpages.

What makes the current generation of services seem promising to those who don't want their screens full of IM ad windows is that no material is distributed unless it's asked for. Some material is now pushed at IM users -- like the banner ads that appear when consumers log on to AIM -- but it's nothing like the tangle of pop-ups and pop-unders so many media websites now deliver.

Source: Business 2.0
Posted on Tuesday, 10 June 2003 @ 09:23:52 UTC by cj (1781 reads)
[ Trackback ]
image

"R U Ready 4 IM Spam?" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: R U Ready 4 IM Spam? (Score: 2, Insighful)
by MrYowler  on Tuesday, 10 June 2003 @ 12:46:15 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://hacking.catalyst.net/
It's possible to design real-time protocols so as to require challenge-based authentication from the user requesting the opportunity to message another. In order to be allowed to send me a message, I can demand that the sending user be on my contacts list, and that I have an authentication key on record for them. If they request to send me a message, then I can send them a challenge phrase, for them to cipher with their authentication key. I can then use my key to determine whether they are who they claim to be, and it can all be done without the chat service knowing what is happenning, or being in possession of either key at any time.

If he authenticates, then I see his message. If not, then I can refuse the message. All of this can happen in an automated fashion - even using a Public Key Infrastructure system, and over existing chat service protocols. Many third parties are writing software clients to support popular protocols; I wrote one, myself, for the Yahoo Chat (YCHT) protocol.

We don't have to put up with IM spam. We don't even have to put up with the advertising that is displayed on the client software, developed by the service providers. We, as users, can control this sort of thing, at our level. Not so, with email - where the corporate users dominate the media. No one IM's Microsoft for support services, so no one need care what protocol Microsoft thinks that we should use, for instant messaging... :)



 
Login
spacer
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Type Security Code: Usage signifies AUP acceptance
· New User? · Click here to create a registered account.
block bottom
Related Links
spacer
· del.icio.us!
· digg it!
· reddit!
· TrackBack (0)
· IBM
· Microsoft
· HotScripts
· W3 Consortium
· Spam Cop
· More about SPAM
· News by cj


Most read story about SPAM:
Messenger Pop-up Spam makes us sick

block bottom
Article Rating
spacer
Average Score: 3
Votes: 1


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


block bottom
Options
spacer

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

block bottom
spacer spacer