CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

$9736.22 of $21422.68
left sidedonated so farneed $11686.46 donated to reach our goalright side, our goal
Help CastleCops serve the community on new servers, Donate Here to reach our goal.

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
Survey
spacer
Was 2007 a good year?

Yes it was a wonderful year
Yes, but there is always room for improvement
Status quo
It was a challenge
Other (leave comment)



Results
Polls

Votes: 934
Comments: 25
block bottom
spacer spacer
image The Courtroom: Hackers Get Novel Defense; the Computer Did It image
Crack Attack
Hackers Get Novel Defense;
the Computer Did It
By Elinor Mills Abreu

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Prosecutors looking to throw the book at accused computer hackers have come across a legal defense expected to become even more widespread in an era of hijacked PCs and laptops that threatens to blur the lines of personal responsibility: the computer did it.

In one case that was being watched as a bellwether by computer security experts, Aaron Caffrey, 19, was acquitted earlier this month in the United Kingdom on charges of hacking into the computer system of the Houston Pilots, an independent contractor for the Port of Houston, in September 2001.

Caffrey had been charged with breaking into the system and crippling the server that provides scheduling information for all ships entering the world's sixth-largest port.

Although authorities traced the hack back to Caffrey's computer, he claimed that someone must have remotely planted a program, called a trojan, onto his computer that did the hacking and that could have been programed to self destruct.

In two other cases, British men were accused of downloading child pornography but their attorneys successfully argued that trojan programs found on their computers were to blame.

It sets a precedent now in the judicial system where a hacker can just claim somebody took over his computer, the program vanished and he's free and clear, said Dave Morrell, a computer consultant for the Houston Pilots who worked with the FBI after the attack.

Michael Allison, chief executive of computer forensics firm Internet Crimes Group in Princeton, New Jersey, said experts should have been able to prove if there had been a trojan on the computer in question.

In some cases, I do suspect there are people whose computer is taken over by third parties, he said. It's also a clever defense to exculpate your client.
PROTECTING THE INNOCENT

But other legal and security experts said the trojan defense is a valid one because computer hijacking occurs all the time and savvy hackers can easily cover their tracks.

I've seen cases where there is a similar defense and it could work or not work based on corroborating evidence such as how technical the defendant is, said Jennifer Stisa Granick, clinical director of the Sanford Law Center for Internet and Society.

It is relatively easy to trace a hack back to a particular computer, but proving that a specific person committed the crime is much more difficult, she and others said.

Someone other than the computer owner could use the machine, either by gaining physical access or remotely installing trojan software that was slipped onto the computer via an e-mail sent to the computer owner or downloaded from a malicious Web site, they said.

On the one hand, this is 100 percent correct that you can not make that jump from computer to keyboard to person, said Bruce Schneier, chief technology officer at Counterpane Internet Security based in Cupertino, California. On the other hand, this defense could (be used) to acquit everybody.

It makes prosecuting the guilty harder, but that's a good thing, he added.

Mark Rasch, former head of the U.S. Department of Justice computer crime unit, agreed.
The more difficult problem is people could actually go to jail for something they didn't do as a result of trojan programs, said Rasch, chief security counsel for computer security provider Solutionary. If I want to do something illegal I want to do it on someone else's machine.

The defense is likely to become more widespread especially given the increasing use of spyware programs that can be used by hackers to steal passwords and essentially eavesdrop on a computer user, experts said.

The emergence of spyware will only enhance these claims, said Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa Law School in Canada. We're going to have to sort through the level of responsibility a person has for operating their own computer. (Additional reporting by Bernhard Warner in London)


Reuters
Posted on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 @ 05:10:00 UTC by phoenix22 (991 reads)
[ Trackback ]
image

"The Courtroom: Hackers Get Novel Defense; the Computer Did It" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register
 
Login
spacer
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Type Security Code: Usage signifies AUP acceptance
· New User? · Click here to create a registered account.
block bottom
Related Links
spacer
· del.icio.us!
· digg it!
· reddit!
· TrackBack (0)
· HotScripts
· W3 Consortium
· More about Crack Attack
· News by phoenix22


Most read story about Crack Attack:
Beware Attacker from IP 200.55.7.235 and Whole 200.x.x.x Block

block bottom
Article Rating
spacer
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


block bottom
Options
spacer

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

block bottom
spacer spacer