CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

$9736.22 of $21422.68
left sidedonated so farneed $11686.46 donated to reach our goalright side, our goal
Help CastleCops serve the community on new servers, Donate Here to reach our goal.

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
Survey
spacer
Was 2007 a good year?

Yes it was a wonderful year
Yes, but there is always room for improvement
Status quo
It was a challenge
Other (leave comment)



Results
Polls

Votes: 949
Comments: 28
block bottom
spacer spacer
image Vircom says less than 15% spammers comply to FTC's pornography image
CastleCops
Anonymous writes "Montreal, June 3, 2004 - Press Release - Montreal-based Vircom, developer of Modus e-mail security solutions, said its SpamBuster Team observed less than 15% compliance with the recent FTC rule for labeling e-mail containing sexually oriented material.

Effective May 19th, the rule adopted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) decreed that all e-mails containing sexually oriented material must include the warning label 'SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT' in the subject line.

Over a 2-week period, Vircom's SpamBuster Team analyzed over 300,000 pornographic e-mails that should have been classified as 'SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT' under the new FTC rule. The result was that only 14.72% of these e-mails were actually labeled in accordance to the law.

Of the rare few we found that actually complied with the new FTC ruling, most came from the same sources said Marc Chouinard, head of Vircom's SpamBuster Team. This indicates that the vast majority of spammers who distribute sexually explicit material either do not know, or do not care about eventual legal repercussions.

In a recent interview with a spammer who exclusively distributes sexually oriented material, Vircom asked why spammers will not comply with the new FTC rule.

If I write 'SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT' in the header, I can guarantee that none of my e-mails will make it through a spam filter. In fact, it won't even make it through Outlook rules said Paul. You might as well kiss your job goodbye.

We are not surprised in the least that spammers are not complying with the labeling rule, said Michael Gaudette, Product Manager for Modus anti-spam solutions.Unless the rule becomes harshly enforced, it will have negligible influence on pornographic spam. You have to remember why spammers actually spam; to get their message through to you.

About the Label for E-Mail Containing Sexually Oriented Material Rule

The Rule implements the requirements of the CAN-SPAM Act by requiring that any person who initiates, to a protected computer, the transmission of a commercial e-mail that includes sexually oriented material must: (1) Exclude sexually oriented materials from the subject heading and include in the subject heading of that e-mail the mark SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT and (2) provide that the matter in the e-mail message that is initially viewable when the message is opened include only certain specified information, not including any sexually oriented material. "
Posted on Friday, 04 June 2004 @ 10:51:59 UTC by Paul (1854 reads)
[ Trackback ]
image

"Vircom says less than 15% spammers comply to FTC's pornography" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register
 
Login
spacer
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Type Security Code: Usage signifies AUP acceptance
· New User? · Click here to create a registered account.
block bottom
Related Links
spacer
· del.icio.us!
· digg it!
· reddit!
· TrackBack (0)
· HotScripts
· W3 Consortium
· Spam Cop
· CastleCops
· More about CastleCops
· News by Paul


Most read story about CastleCops:
Acceptable Use Policy

block bottom
Article Rating
spacer
Average Score: 4.85
Votes: 14


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


block bottom
Options
spacer

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

block bottom
spacer spacer