CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

$9736.22 of $21422.68
left sidedonated so farneed $11686.46 donated to reach our goalright side, our goal
Help CastleCops serve the community on new servers, Donate Here to reach our goal.

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
Survey
spacer
Was 2007 a good year?

Yes it was a wonderful year
Yes, but there is always room for improvement
Status quo
It was a challenge
Other (leave comment)



Results
Polls

Votes: 937
Comments: 25
block bottom
spacer spacer
image More Port 445 Activity Could Mean Security Trouble image
CyberCrime
cj writes "An apparent increase in scanning activity may signal an impending malicious-code attack exploiting a critical Windows vulnerability. Take immediate steps to ensure that the affected Windows port is secure.

On 17 June 2005, media reports indicated that security vulnerability sensors have noted an increase in activity on TCP Port 445, which is associated with Microsoft Windows' Server Message Block (SMB) Protocol. This port could potentially be used to exploit the Microsoft Incoming SMB Packet Validation Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability (MS05-27), a critical flaw for which Microsoft released a patch on 14 June.

Analysis The apparent increase in sniffing on Port 445 is a serious concern for enterprise security managers, because it may indicate an impending mass malicious-code attack. Such attacks typically follow a highly predictable timeline:

  1. A security vulnerability is identified and a patch is released.
  2. Attackers use the patch to reverse-engineer the vulnerability.
  3. Exploit code is developed and circulated on the Internet.
  4. Attackers scan to find vulnerable systems.
  5. A mass attack is launched.
The Port 445 activity may indicate that — in the week since Microsoft released the Windows patch — attackers have reached the fourth state in this process and may be preparing a mass attack employing the widely used SMB protocol.

More at Gartner.com "
Posted on Tuesday, 21 June 2005 @ 23:42:23 UTC by Paul (2138 reads)
[ Trackback ]
image

"More Port 445 Activity Could Mean Security Trouble" | Login/Create an Account | 4 comments | Search
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: More Port 445 Activity Could Mean Security Trouble (Score: 1)
by LostAccount (Bgtysjal@hsmaj.com)  on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 @ 03:26:44 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
A router can block this since the only thing scanned would be the router itself. So will a properly configured firewall that blocks incoming connections to this port and other ports.

And port 445 (SMB) and Netbios (137-139) can be disabled and the ports closed completely:

http://www.petri.co.il/what's_port_445_in_w2k_xp_2003.htm



Re: More Port 445 Activity Could Mean Security Trouble (Score: 1)
by AplusWebMaster  on Thursday, 23 June 2005 @ 07:56:54 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.apluswebmaster.net/
'Looks kind of flat to me. May be much ado about nothing:

- http://isc.sans.org/port_details.php?port=445






Re: More Port 445 Activity Could Mean Security Trouble (Score: 1)
by AplusWebMaster  on Thursday, 23 June 2005 @ 18:14:46 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.apluswebmaster.net/
Also:

- http://www.techweb.com/wire/security/164902272 [www.techweb.com]
June 23, 2005
...One of the workarounds Microsoft described in its security bulletin http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS05-027.mspx [www.microsoft.com] of last week was to block ports 139 and 445, inbound and outbound, at the firewall. [This] will help prevent systems that are behind that firewall from attempts to exploit this vulnerability...

...so, the answer may be (as always) Are you up-to-date or vulnerable to Hackers?



 
Login
spacer
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Type Security Code: Usage signifies AUP acceptance
· New User? · Click here to create a registered account.
block bottom
Related Links
spacer
· del.icio.us!
· digg it!
· reddit!
· TrackBack (0)
· Microsoft
· Microsoft
· HotScripts
· W3 Consortium
· More about CyberCrime
· News by Paul


Most read story about CyberCrime:
Botmasters Take Heed – You Are Being Put On Notice

block bottom
Article Rating
spacer
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


block bottom
Options
spacer

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

block bottom
spacer spacer