CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
spacer spacer
image Moral relativism or common sense? image
General News
In a bid to promote to the forefront various discussions at CastleCops (we are indeed security focused, however forums exist for a diverse rande of subjects), I'd like to highlight a thread created by our member buddhababe. buddhababe starts off a three page community chat which is partially quoted here:

I've noticed a theme in a few threads and rather than divert the topics, I thought I'd start a new one. Specifically, there are two posts that I would like to address. The first, by habiru in the homosexuality thread, and the second, by marriedwkids in the religious commitment thread.

...

I believe that morality and ethics are a construct of society, not god. For, it could be argued, man created god and therefor any and all morality applied to god/religion is, in reality, a construct of man. However, if one were to assume, as I'm sure many of you will, that man did not create god, and therefor the morality mankind has established is instead a direct result of god's commandments, then we still have a situation where man is interpreting gods moral code (i.e....manslaughter vs. murder) with his own subjectivity. Either way, the desire and need to follow the delineated moral and ethical code is a direct result of the individuals desire not only to avoid punishment and incarceration, but also to avoid being ostracized and ejected from his/her society, whether for religious reasons (i.e., being deemed a sinner, a heretic, etc..) or for community based reasons which can be as simple as no one trusting you or wanting to be your friend (i.e. isolation from the group).

As a result of the desire to avoid either of the above outcomes, morality and ethics then become directly related to the societal needs, such as peaceful cohabitation with one's neighbor, belonging to the group, avoidance of jealousy and the end result of actions taken out of jealousy, etc.; basically any act that results in a disturbance of the peace on a societal scale.

...

The full post in its entirety (along with the discussion) can be found here.
Posted on Sunday, 21 January 2007 @ 12:14:55 UTC by Paul (1368 reads)
[ Trackback ]
image

"Moral relativism or common sense?" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register
 
Login
spacer
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Type Security Code: Usage signifies AUP acceptance
· New User? · Click here to create a registered account.
block bottom
Related Links
spacer
· del.icio.us!
· digg it!
· reddit!
· TrackBack (0)
· HotScripts
· W3 Consortium
· More about General News
· News by Paul


Most read story about General News:
Weekly Spyware Alert: CoolWebSearch

block bottom
Article Rating
spacer
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


block bottom
Options
spacer

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

block bottom
spacer spacer