CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

$9736.22 of $21422.68
left sidedonated so farneed $11686.46 donated to reach our goalright side, our goal
Help CastleCops serve the community on new servers, Donate Here to reach our goal.

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
Survey
spacer
Was 2007 a good year?

Yes it was a wonderful year
Yes, but there is always room for improvement
Status quo
It was a challenge
Other (leave comment)



Results
Polls

Votes: 951
Comments: 28
block bottom
spacer spacer
image Site: Requests for Deletions image
CastleCops
In the past weeks, we have received several requests to delete threads or posts that the people making the requests have deemed to be defamatory or otherwise damaging to them. Some of these requests have been accompanied with various demands and threats of legal action if the threads are not removed. Given the frequency of these requests over the past several weeks and similarities among some of them, they may be a concerted effort to harass, intimidate, or otherwise threaten CastleCops, its administration, and its volunteer staff.

Laws of the United States pertaining to interactive service providers, such as the forum service provided by CastleCops, as well as the laws of other nations have been designed to protect and encourage the growth of such interactive services. These laws provide protection from lawsuits, particularly those of a frivolous nature. Specifically, the laws of the United States deem that CastleCops is not the publisher of statements made in the forums and therefore cannot be held liable for any allegedly defamatory content. We would hasten to point out that the poster making defamatory or other statements for which a legal remedy is available may be liable under these laws.

Despite the fact that CastleCops cannot legally be held responsible as the publisher of the contents of posts in the forums, we recognize and accept the fact that our responsibility to our members, guests, the community of computer users, and society in general extends beyond the minimum standards established by law. Our Acceptable Use Policy, acceptance of which is required for registration and must be acknowledged each time a member signs on to CastleCops, prohibits posts that are “unlawful, harmful to minors, threatening, harassing, abusive, defamatory, vulgar, gratuitously violent, obscene, pornographic, libelous, invasive of another's privacy” among other things. Guests who post also agree to abide by the AUP.

Administrators, moderators, and other staff will always take appropriate actions when any post in violation of these or other rules or policies is brought to their attention. Such action may include removing the post, warning or even banning the poster, or both. We ask the cooperation of our members in calling attention to such offending posts so they may be dealt with appropriately. Requests to deal with offending posts can be easily made by “blue carding” them, i.e., clicking the blue button at the top right of every post.

However, requests to deal with offending posts, including possibly deleting them, must be made in a timely manner. The requests, demands, and threats referred to above have been in relation to posts that are at least a year old and in one instance two years old. CastleCops performs what we believe to be a valuable service to our members and guests. Staff resources are limited and cannot be taken away from providing this service to deal with stale posts, particularly when the person making the complaint refuses reasonable attempts to remedy the situation and instead resorts to threats of frivolous legal action or otherwise engages in harassing behavior.

We ask all our members and guests to cooperate with us in providing this service. We appreciate your efforts and we assure you that we will give our best to provide service in an honest and beneficial manner. We hope you will continue to recognize the good will with which we undertake these efforts. As for those who would engage in attempts to harass, threaten, or intimidate, we assure you that we will not be silenced.
Posted on Thursday, 26 July 2007 @ 16:32:43 UTC by Paul (2237 reads)
[ Trackback ]
image

"Site: Requests for Deletions" | Login/Create an Account | 4 comments | Search
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Requests for Deletions (Score: 1)
by sundog  on Friday, 27 July 2007 @ 09:06:07 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.weblightstudio.com.au
Thank you, not much money here but if it gets bad perhaps I can add my weight with an email. You do great work



Re: Requests for Deletions (Score: 1)
by Mad_Dog  on Friday, 27 July 2007 @ 12:57:49 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Thanks for the heads up.



Re: Requests for Deletions (Score: 1)
by hitbit  on Sunday, 29 July 2007 @ 23:21:14 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Its not Aluria again by any chance is it. God forbid that anyone should do anything to upset them given their record of righteous do-gooding.

hitbit



Re: Requests for Deletions (Score: 1)
by jpcook  on Monday, 06 August 2007 @ 20:49:11 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
IMHO, go slow.

When someone (thing, corporation, business, etc.) conveys what you perceive a threat, legal threat, use of legal process, etc. go very slow. Respond affirmatively with few words and core facts.

IMHO, deal only in writing on paper.

No phone call complaints.
No eMail complaints.

This means you have to ask for or receive a written complaint which should include a verifiable physical address, a real person’s name, a real phone number, etc.

Do not conduct a discussion via eMail.

Dear Mr. Whatever,

Thanks for the letter.

It is our intent and we believe we are acting within the law as defined in the US Constitution, the Constitution of (State) and all Federal and local laws. (If in another country, cite the applicable)

If you feel we are in violation of any of these laws, please provide us with the facts as you understand them and cite applicable law. Please include any support you may have for damages you view as resulting from our conduct.

Sincerely,

Whatever

IMHO, 90% of all complaints will end here unless it’s the M$ police. It is my understanding they are going to sue God for the use of “Windows” in the Bible.


I sit here and I’m thinking of how totally nuts someone would have to be to put money into a suit against you guys. I marvel at the gall these boys have; the viable claims they might find, economics of such a suit, the jurisdiction issues, elements of proof, the deep pockets (?), and a dozen other issues. If you guys are all driving Countach’s, knowingly and with malice destroyed someone’s business, you may, just “may” have a problem, but probably not. Most business minded people know you achieve nothing which benefits the plaintiff or defendant by going to the courts – you just transfer wealth from your pockets to your attorney’s pocket. Bullies with deep pockets, Oracle, M$, etc, can and will.
Let me know if I can help you in any way. I’d be happy to at least be a second opinion. And, I’d charge you what you charged me for all the help you’ve given me…. Nada.


Hang in there. You guys are important for many reasons. And I think you have a very strong following that if called to help, would.



 
Login
spacer
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Type Security Code: Usage signifies AUP acceptance
· New User? · Click here to create a registered account.
block bottom
Related Links
spacer
· del.icio.us!
· digg it!
· reddit!
· TrackBack (0)
· HotScripts
· W3 Consortium
· CastleCops
· More about CastleCops
· News by Paul


Most read story about CastleCops:
Acceptable Use Policy

block bottom
Article Rating
spacer
Average Score: 5
Votes: 2


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


block bottom
Options
spacer

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

block bottom
spacer spacer