|
Donation/Premium |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
trobbins
SIRT Handler Premium Member
 Joined: Feb 19, 2007 Posts: 1180 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I look at it this way, whether you report spam or not, you will still get spam. Until all the spammers are either in jail, or it cost too much, spam is not going to go away. I have one address that I actually use, and 5 others on the same domain that I had to abandon 4 years ago because of spam. 2 of those address's were never, I repeat never used to sign up for anything, and they get the same kind of spam my active email account does. Once you get on a list, you are there for life, or until every single copy is destroyed. Those 5 email address's bounced every single email until a year ago. Did that stop them from receiving spam? No. Has reporting to SpamCop or Knujon, complainterator etc. stop or reduced spam? No. My spam volume goes up and it goes down. Some days I get 200, then occasionally I get more than 1,000 in a day. In the end all you can do is feel good that you are doing something worth while, helping to amass mountains of evidence against these spammers, and if you personally send reports to the registrars, you get to feel real good when you get some of their expensive domains shut down. And it feels even better when that domain is shut down as quickly as the same day it was registered.
The small amount that Knujon is asking for is minimal compared to what you would pay for a decent spam filter. And spam filters are the equivalent of shutting down an email address for years, and that didn't work. Your only other alternative is to get a new email address and guard it with your life.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ColdRain
Cadet

 Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: 4 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think that you have misunderstood what was said. The "freeloaders" you mentioned were actually very helpful and very much appreciated beta testers. It is just that the number of clients has grown large, along with the amount of work to be done. Some beta testers stopped participating, but their acounts were still active and required processing.
| Anonymous wrote: | | From knujon's response here and based on the personal explanation I received from Knujon, it appears that their attempts to follow up on the spam of free loaders has caused them to become neglectful of the spam of paid members. |
Unless you are rich, funds are required to buy servers and network access. We could sell advertising space, but we thought it better to charge a small fee, about lunch money size, instead. I still need to buy food and pay the mortgage like everyone else. Since we are small we need to spend a lot time on details, like wrting software, managing servers, etc. That is time that could otherwise be spent making money, but we are committed.
| Anonymous wrote: | | Anytime that your project depends on monetary funds, logic would dictate that you prioritize and not neglect the spam of your paid membership at the expense of the spam of free loaders. If you don't you risk losing paid members upon which the very success of your project hinges. Knujon, you cannot justify not adequately serving your paid membership because you get bogged down trying to service free loader; it really comes down to prioritization. |
It does not simply come down to "prioritization" because running any organization requires priorities. If we have failed in some way to serve our paying clients, we need to fix whatever that is.
| Anonymous wrote: | | There comes a point where you have to make a logical not illogical decision. It may be time to do some serious house cleaning and not say that you will. If unpaid members are getting their reported spam followed up on at the expense of paid members, why would I choose to be stupid enough to pay you a membership fee. Think about it for heaven's sake!! I agree with the other poster, perhaps I would have better success using those funds to bribe the spammers to take me off their list. |
Most of our clients have reported a drop in spam levels, but not all. There are many possible reasons for that to happen. Not even the best spam filters will claim 100%.
We have always said that this is not an instant fix. Reporting and getting results take time, but eventually we are successful. If the problem was easy to solve, it would have been solved already.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
marmaduke
Cadet

 Joined: Feb 26, 2007 Posts: 5 Location: Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mha
Sergeant
 Premium Member
 Joined: Dec 20, 2003 Posts: 148 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
My spam hasn't gone down all too much because of the overall increase in spammer action, but the total sites pending and shut down is over half of the total sites I have reported to Knujon in the last 18 months. I'd say that was pretty good.
Happy New Year Knujon! May this be "the year" for good things to happen!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ahoier
SIRT Handler
 Joined: Jan 14, 2006 Posts: 1102 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think KnujOn has put a dent in my spam box.
Now the whole problem I've been seeing, I receive spam, but the DOMAINS are already either shut down (NXDOMAIN) or not resolving - either due to nameserver timing out, or whever.
I mean it's a start. Between SpamCop (alerting the administrators running the bad mail servers), Botnet Reporting (alerting the admin/hosts of compromised machines), Complainterator (reporting spamvertised domains to the registrars), and other projects, it's just taking time.
But dead domains is definately progress.
They don't make any money if they are spamming domains that are offline, not responding, NXDOMAIN, or just lagged to hell (retaliators! )
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AlphaCentauri
SIRT Handler Premium Member
 Joined: Nov 20, 2003 Posts: 2886
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some of those NXDOMAINS are the Canadian Pharmacy sites that Nodus and trobbins have been reporting in bulk. They seem to have established contact with someone at Beijing Innovative, someone at Bizcn.com, and someone at TodayNIC, and they'll get dozens of domains taken down -- sometimes within a few hours. Canadian Pharmacy is a large percentage of the spam in your inbox, and they register thousands of domains (most often in the pattern of two English words, like pigeonboat.com or sandwichcloset.cn) and spam each one only for a day or two, so URL block lists can't keep up.
When HKDNR finally started shutting down the 1500+ sites registered there, after a while they developed their own procedure for identifying them, and would catch them even before anyone reported them. That's the eventual goal -- registrars who take pride in never registering any of these criminal domains in the first place.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ikeb
Special Response Team Forums Admin
 Joined: Apr 20, 2003 Posts: 16542
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's good to know AC. Thanks! 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mha
Sergeant
 Premium Member
 Joined: Dec 20, 2003 Posts: 148 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
My new web hosting company has very strict rules, and I think they probably watch the activity from new users. It is one of the few hosts with a forum and when I read the pre-sale questions, you wouldn't believe what some people asked if they could do! They are a reseller of Tucows (as registrar) and Tucows own web hosting company (Domain Direct) is probably loaded with spammers. I read in comments on a blog of theirs that even their site holding pages have had rather questionable links. They blame Google, but doesn't Google weed out spammer links they sell space for ("Ads by Google"), or is Google just in it for the $$ ?
BTW, I never click on any of those little Google links. Most look like junk, but I have never seen one that looked pornographic or selling foreign pharmaceuticals.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AlphaCentauri
SIRT Handler Premium Member
 Joined: Nov 20, 2003 Posts: 2886
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Google will respond to complaints but realistically, how much can they do to screen the ads? Even if they made a prior visit to every site, once an affiliate was enrolled, they could just change the content.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenkPoley
Cadet

 Joined: Jan 30, 2008 Posts: 2 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My spam rate has literally halved. Reported al my gmail spam to Knujon several times per day for a year or so. Got 1300 spams per month, now only 650 and dropping, since I stopped submitting to Knujon.
I think I will continue doing this, I'm sorry to say. I really thought this would have been a good replacement for Bluefrog, but it isn't.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trobbins
SIRT Handler Premium Member
 Joined: Feb 19, 2007 Posts: 1180 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe yahoo.com instituted better spam filters recently. I know I get much less spam at yahoo. Gmail might have instituted similar filters.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HenkPoley
Cadet

 Joined: Jan 30, 2008 Posts: 2 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The gmail filter was and is excellent. If they do anything retroactively I do not know (don't think so). I bet they drop the spam websites from their index though, or at least use the "this site is potentially dangerous"-redirect.
But that doesn't really account for the drop due to stopping submitting to Knujon.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trobbins
SIRT Handler Premium Member
 Joined: Feb 19, 2007 Posts: 1180 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I meant that the drop is probably due to the filtering. I haven't reported yahoo spam for 6 months and it was getting hundreds/day. Now suddenly it gets <100/week.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ahoier
SIRT Handler
 Joined: Jan 14, 2006 Posts: 1102 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| trobbins wrote: | | I believe yahoo.com instituted better spam filters recently. I know I get much less spam at yahoo. Gmail might have instituted similar filters. | I've been watching my sister's inbox, and there are still depositscams (419) that make it through to her inbox...
But yea, Gmail went through a phase too, where stuff was not being labeled as Junk, and ending in my Inbox....but I think they might "loosen up" the filters a bit, every so often to give the e-mail scanner robots "something new" to work with, per say...hehe. And of course, as people report the stuff that floats to the Inbox, the noose gets tighter again
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
f1jim
Trooper

 Joined: Aug 11, 2007 Posts: 12 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 3:15 pm Post subject: Don't hold your breath... |
|
|
Don't hold your breath waiting for anything substantive with Knujon. They are becomming less and less visible. I keep watching this site because of a perverse interest. I stopped reporting last year and just as when I signed up, spam goes up and down. It has actually trended down more since I stopped reporting!!! Lot's of folks here doing what I did...Waiting and hoping Knujon will have an effect. Don't hold your breath.
f1jim
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
|