|
Donation/Premium |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bjz
Trooper

 Joined: Dec 31, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 6:22 am Post subject: Measuring Effect on spam |
|
|
I signed up for knujon and began reporting in late December. In January it occurred to me that I should keep track of how many spams I receive each day. I thought I would share the data I have collected so far. It's not enough yet to draw a conclusion, but there does seem to be a downward trend.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
24.57 KB |
| Viewed: |
82 Time(s) |

|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pwillener
SRT Trainee
 Premium Member
 Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 1838 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Welcome to the CC Forum.
I have sent spam to KnujOn for about 1½ years, but it has never occurred to me to count my daily spam. But it's a good idea, and if I had, I would be able to prove my feeling that the spam levels on all my accounts are slowly getting down.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ahoier
SIRT Handler
 Joined: Jan 14, 2006 Posts: 1118 Location: USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bjz
Trooper

 Joined: Dec 31, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the welcome. My goal in doing this was just as you said, to either confirm or not the feeling that spam was declining. Wouldn't you know the day after I posted this chart, the amount of spam I get in a day shot up and has been rising ever since. I will post an updated chart here about once a week.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ahoier
SIRT Handler
 Joined: Jan 14, 2006 Posts: 1118 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spam will go up and down.
Also, keep in mind, with the "opt out" feature enabled with KnujOn, Knujon will send out opt out requests on your behalf.
Though, I'm not extremely sure how they do these opt out requests..
But the way I look at it, they already got my address, so why not show them I care by revealing my address to them by unsubscribing (well, letting Knujon unsubscribe me...really).
Sure, they may see woo hoo, it's an active address?! So they spam me more; and the pile of evidence just keeps getting bigger and bigger Until they finally get "trapped" and get thrown in jail, fined, or ....killed (lol...joking, but everyone dies eventually, even spammers)?
On the other hand, taking down a spammers domain, doesn't "clean" the computer sending the spam. Which is why it's a multi-tiered effort. I'm sure it's a simple command on the "command and control" side, to switch botnetted hosts over to a new domain name. But eventually that domain will be shut down too.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IP: 24.79.*.*
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
A lot of that is true and I hate to sound negative. Money makes the world go around, not just for spammers but the few stupid registars that will not likely act against the spammers unless legally forced to do so by authorities. For some of these registars, the spammers probably represent 90% of their business, which means a good loss of profit and revenue for the registars if they give the spammers the boot, so in a way this is kind of symbiotic win win situation for both the registar and the spammers. This is only speculation on my part, and the only evidence that points to this is highly circumstantial. But take a look at the new spam name servers that are constantly emerging and take a good hard look at the registars involved. Notice a common theme. I see at least one, without mentioning names of registars involved. Why would a spammer continue to registar new name servers with the same registar unless the spammer already knows which registars s/he can safely hide behind.
Bottom line, authorities on a global scale really need to crack down on the many spam friendly registars and this will likely put a major dent in spammer activity. Until then, this will continue to be an uphill battle of cat and mouse.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ahoier
SIRT Handler
 Joined: Jan 14, 2006 Posts: 1118 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
yep, and that's one of the reasons Complainterator was created, to show the registrars the evidence, and information that it IS possible for them to take control of their registered domains.
But yea, when they kill a spam domain, I'm sure they also lose that money....
But I've also seen some "refunded domains" lists when doing domain name research (for complainterator evidence....) - makes me go, WTF? The REGISTAR "refunds" the spammer for "breaking" their ToS? That just don't seem right....lol.
I wish I could find the link now, but it contained a whole list of "refunded" domains, one or two of which I personally remembered from seeing in spam e-mails I received.
http://www.refundedlookup.com/content_pages/refunded_info/refunded_info.php looks like it might be "similar" to what I saw, but I dont think that's the same site.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brownbird
Cadet

 Joined: Jan 11, 2008 Posts: 6 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ahoier wrote: | yep, and that's one of the reasons Complainterator was created, to show the registrars the evidence, and information that it IS possible for them to take control of their registered domains.
But yea, when they kill a spam domain, I'm sure they also lose that money....
But I've also seen some "refunded domains" lists when doing domain name research (for complainterator evidence....) - makes me go, WTF? The REGISTAR "refunds" the spammer for "breaking" their ToS? That just don't seem right....lol.
I wish I could find the link now, but it contained a whole list of "refunded" domains, one or two of which I personally remembered from seeing in spam e-mails I received.
http://www.refundedlookup.com/content_pages/refunded_info/refunded_info.php looks like it might be "similar" to what I saw, but I dont think that's the same site. |
Yes, registars who are responsible enough and have a moral conscious will certainly take such actions and I applaud their efforts because of it wasn't for those responsible registars, with a moral conscious and who think with their heads and not their wallets, spam would likely be a much bigger problem.
Keep in mind that spam continues to be a problem because of a a select few registars that spammers know that they can hide behind. Someone(government, authorities, etc.,) needs to pull the plug on those registars who refuse to deal with spam because they are only looking at dollar signs and not victims of the spam or the criminal activity associated with the spammers. There is very little Knujon, SIRT or individual use of complainterator can do in these situations.
Case in point: Most of the spam that I have received as been from spammers registered with the following registar. Look at the stats and draw your own conclusions.
Source:http://wiki.castlecops.com/Bulk_Spam_Reporting
XIN NET Removals- 0%
Reported: 2,178
Suspended: 4 [/b]
I guess 4 suspensions are better than nothing but when you look at it at it relative to the total number of reported sites, that is really a drop in the bucket and in my estimation the Registar is capable of suspending more and even removing domains. Why they don't, I think I know why, but won't repeat that here and don't want to pi$$ off the Registar too much since we have to try and work cooperatively with the registar and be respectful of them(I know).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bjz
Trooper

 Joined: Dec 31, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here is this weeks chart
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
26.17 KB |
| Viewed: |
63 Time(s) |

|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ahoier
SIRT Handler
 Joined: Jan 14, 2006 Posts: 1118 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
It might be also helpful to know what other service(s) you are using. SpamCop, SIRT, manually sending off Complainterator reports? etc.
They all "add up" to great evidence, as you will notice a lot of the "heavy hitters" (high instances tally) are the ones that are "dead" the most So I think eventually the registrar just gets tired of seeing reports and suspends them, or who knows, maybe they expire..lol.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bjz
Trooper

 Joined: Dec 31, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
You're absolutely right, I have been using Spamcop quick reporting for well over a year. the effect from spamcop reports seemed to have leveled out quite some time ago, although it had been very effective the first time is used it back in 2004. SpamCop and Knujon are the only services I use.
I have turned off knujon's automatic unsubscribe feature because I am sure that everything I submit is unsolicited. I do not obfuscate my email address in spamcop reports.
My setup is almost entirely automated, using applescript and MS Entourage, so that email messages that score high on my spam filter are automatically reported without me having to do anything. (I have set the threshold for automatic reporting high enough that I have less that 0.01% false positives.)
The email account I am keeping statistics for is a .edu email address. The university uses a barracuda spam firewall which I have configured to tag and forward spam to me instead of quarantining it. (I always thought that spam quarantines were more annoying than the spam anyway, having to log on to a different place just to make sure nothing useful got caught.) The spam firewall is actually very configurable, which makes optimizing the spam score tolerance a breeze.
One thing I have noticed is that my "pending suspensions number has not gone up since several days before the spike you see in the chart.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bjz
Trooper

 Joined: Dec 31, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is the latest chart
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
38.36 KB |
| Viewed: |
45 Time(s) |

|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bjz
Trooper

 Joined: Dec 31, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know if this is due to KnujOn, but my junk mail has dropped dramatically this week. Here is the latest chart.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
48.01 KB |
| Viewed: |
52 Time(s) |

|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bjz
Trooper

 Joined: Dec 31, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Latest Chart, Spam has stayed low for several weeks.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
55.68 KB |
| Viewed: |
56 Time(s) |

|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brewt
SIRT Handler Premium Member
 Joined: May 29, 2007 Posts: 792 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
You aren't using AT&T email, by any chance, are you?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
|