|
Donation/Premium |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
esacnitsuj
Colonel
Joined: Mar 06, 2003
Posts: 1842
Location: Out There Somewhere!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JoAnnCQ
Warnings : 2
Major
Premium Member
Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Posts: 1269
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | (22) Jesus saw infants being suckled. He said to his disciples, "These infants being suckled are like those who enter the kingdom."
They said to him, "Shall we then, as children, enter the kingdom?"
Jesus said to them, "When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female; and when you fashion eyes in the place of an eye, and a hand in place of a hand, and a foot in place of a foot, and a likeness in place of a likeness; then will you enter the kingdom."
from the Gospel of Thomas
http://www.webcom.com/gnosis/naghamm/gthlamb.html |
Oh & this is the one I really should've quoted back when - My head must've been really spinning (thanks Bingo!)
I'm gonna take Quincy for a walk now so bye!
Happy Mother's Day to all You Mothers (& EveryOne else too!)
Love,
JoAnn
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JoAnnCQ
Warnings : 2
Major
Premium Member
Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Posts: 1269
|
| Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh & just one more thing.
Bingo darlin'? Charles Schultz (the Creator of Peanuts) including Lucyfer was an Atheist.) Just wanted to make sure You knew that (You probably are aware of that already!)
& hate to bring this up again but ... have You given any thought at all to the other thingy?
bye luv
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JoAnnCQ
Warnings : 2
Major
Premium Member
Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Posts: 1269
|
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey I really like the Animals in Love video on UTuuuube! 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
esacnitsuj
Colonel
Joined: Mar 06, 2003
Posts: 1842
Location: Out There Somewhere!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JoAnnCQ
Warnings : 2
Major
Premium Member
Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Posts: 1269
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
esacnitsuj
Colonel
Joined: Mar 06, 2003
Posts: 1842
Location: Out There Somewhere!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JoAnnCQ
Warnings : 2
Major
Premium Member
Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Posts: 1269
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
esacnitsuj
Colonel
Joined: Mar 06, 2003
Posts: 1842
Location: Out There Somewhere!
|
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hiya JaCQ-E-Poo, I Luv U 
| Quote: | Hi David,
Yeah I know what You mean, I think I see what You're saying here. When I said "Who?" I was thinking about a Tom & Jerry cartoon. |
I just don't want you to get in trouble, that's all. I like you to much & if you got banned, you'd have to set up proxies like Q did many times & had diff u-names 
I think Q is BigFelix, but is, bit is hiding it, but perhaps not. Maybe he's taking a "time out". I hope he doesn't do anything stupid, if you know what I mean?
Hey JACQ-E-Pooooo...I Luv You......Peace!
_________________
Warm Regards,
David (esacnitsuj)
EULAGree With Security
| Quote: | "A Weak Mind Can Be Easily Controlled!"
"Ni Bastori Carborundum" ©1963 SQIV |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TotoCanReadto
Captain
Joined: Jun 04, 2007
Posts: 706
Location: Togo
|
| Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
JoAnnCQ,
I don't care for the term Religion, Christian, etc.
I care of others or in their care I don't use religious terms, and since I make no attempt at small talk I don't see the need to think of others in religious terms.
I think God see's me, Larry Kilgore.
And he doesn't see a religious name, but a person.
I don't care Peanuts creator was not religious.
Why would I wear a Woman Cloths.
Do they tll you I should?
Wink wink.
David,
I don't believe in existance after we die.
We sleep till we are resurrected.
Hell on Earth?
David, a mind is a terrible thing to waste.
_________________
To the Women of Golgotha. Beware of Batman.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
esacnitsuj
Colonel
Joined: Mar 06, 2003
Posts: 1842
Location: Out There Somewhere!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TotoCanReadto
Captain
Joined: Jun 04, 2007
Posts: 706
Location: Togo
|
| Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
esacnitsuj,
As to how the world will end. I will try to tell you how I see it.
There is a recent thread where I talk about being resurrected a woman.
In it I talk about something calle "Si".
Now, the Si of the World is simple.
In Sum. You be strong, pretty, educated, etc...
And the herd mentality will love you.
But a herd of Animals is predictable.
Like Cattle.
God the bible says is a grower of things.
In great truth, he grows Sperm in the Man.
And wants the man now to keep him at this task unnessessarily.
Now Gos will grow a Man, who will not be a part of the herd.
And this is the man God will call "Civility", "a man to reckon with", "a man of quality".
Because of the Si.
And once God has this Elect man, the End will come.
Not immediately, but within a generation.
_________________
To the Women of Golgotha. Beware of Batman.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JoAnnCQ
Warnings : 2
Major
Premium Member
Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Posts: 1269
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| seafsee wrote: | | JoAnnCQ wrote: | | ...there are still laws on the books (from that time) in six or seven States which prevent a person from holding public office who does not declare allegiance to a particular religion. |
I was wondering if you are able to elaborate on this: quote??? Any links 
Charles |
| Quote: | The "no religious test" clause of the United States Constitution is found in Article VI, section 3, and states that:
“ ...no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States. ”
This has been interpreted to mean that no federal employee, whether elected or appointed, "career" or "political," can be required to adhere to or accept any religion or belief. This clause immediately follows one requiring all federal and state officers to take an oath of support to the Constitution. This implies that the requirement of an oath, even presumably one taken "So help me God" (not a part of the presidential oath, the only one spelled out in the Constitution, but traditionally almost always added to it), does not imply any requirement by those so sworn to accept a particular religion or a particular doctrine.
The clause is cited by advocates of separation of church and state as an example of "original intent" of the Framers of the Constitution of avoiding any entanglement between church and state, or involving the government in any way as a determiner of religious beliefs or practices. This is important as this clause represents the words of the original Framers, even prior to the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
State law
Earlier in U.S. history, the doctrine of states' rights allowed individual states to choose not to have this provision in their state constitutions or even to have an opposite provision; such provisions have by extension in recent decades been deemed to be unconstitutional by the extension of the First Amendment provisions to the states (via the incorporation of the 14th Amendment).
Six states, however, have language included in their Bill of Rights, Declaration of Rights, or in the body of their constitutions that require state office-holders to have particular religious beliefs. These states are Texas, Massachusetts, Maryland, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee. The required beliefs include belief in a Supreme Being, and belief in a future state of rewards and punishments. Some of these same states specify that the oath of office include the words "so help me God." In some cases these beliefs (or oaths) were historically required also of jurors, witnesses in court, notaries public, and state employees. While these laws are often regarded as relics, if it became known that a non-believer was elected to office, there is the possibility of a court challenge over eligibility. In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that such language in state constitutions was in violation of Article VI of the U.S. Constitution in Torcaso v. Watkins. In 1997 the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that the state constitution requiring an oath to God for employment in the public sector was unconstitutional.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_religious_test_clause |
Hi Charles,
I was researching something else & came across this. I also wanted to comment on some of the other things You said back then but don't have enuff time right now.
Notice, "In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that such language in state constitutions was in violation of Article VI of the U.S. Constitution."
Sort of troubling, isn't it? I mean with the way things are going? & the way that some of the Peoples are grasping at straws out of desperation?
Love & Piece,
JoAnn
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
|
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Login to check your private messages
Login
& you can ask "Diety" to let you visit your friends in "Hell on earth", without the radiation harming you? Then you can go back to Heaven when you're finished...Do you believe that 
I was having. I was thinking about starting a 
]