|
Donation/Premium |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
choicefresh
Lieutenant
Joined: Jul 06, 2006
Posts: 201
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Even when using the latest version, since today I keep getting the error mentioned in the first post of this thread.
I checked, and I have IMAP enabled.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rainwolf
Sergeant
Joined: May 18, 2006
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| choicefresh wrote: | Even when using the latest version, since today I keep getting the error mentioned in the first post of this thread.
I checked, and I have IMAP enabled. |
you mean the line 145-error? It could be that imap @ google is just having the hickups. If this persists through tomorrow then email me.
wal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cybe
Trooper
Joined: Oct 03, 2006
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like Google doesn't want to forward my spam anymore (sometimes?)
| Quote: |
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
se0988 {AT} coldrain.net
Technical details of permanent failure:
Message rejected. See http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=69585 for more information.
|
Would it be a good idea to add the feature to gknujon that would allow it to forward the spam from another SMTP ?
Staff Edit: email address amended
_________________
The Way
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ahoier
SIRT Handler
Joined: Jan 14, 2006
Posts: 1085
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You may want to munge your knujon reporting address there buddy 
What does your config file look like for gknujon (or gspamcop if you use that)?
Most importantly, how many messages do you have it set to send per message?
Perhaps you've just "hit the barrier" and Google won't allow the large amount of messages (or, possibly even the message size) to be forwarded over their network.
I personally, have my set to "11"
Without any problems thus far (though It has been a while since I've used the plugin....so perhaps Google has stepped in and is restricting spam forwarding in mass amounts....? Who knows...)
But yea, try throttling the -maxReportSize number first....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rainwolf
Sergeant
Joined: May 18, 2006
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ahoier wrote: |
But yea, try throttling the -maxReportSize number first.... |
keep us posted, i'm curious to see if that was a one time thing and/or if that solved your issue. If not I will consider implementing the use of alternate smtp-servers.
meanwhile, have fun,
wal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ahoier
SIRT Handler
Joined: Jan 14, 2006
Posts: 1085
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Something I was thinking, would be to have an alternative method for bundling the messages, especially for gspamcop, in which spamcop states (somewhere on their site....) they only take spam submissions that are less than ~40KB (example...I can't remember the exact value).
Now, I don't know if the "overflow" would be bounced, letting you know you sent "too much" - or if those messages that "overflow" are just gobbled up into oblivion (dev/null/? lol) or something 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rainwolf
Sergeant
Joined: May 18, 2006
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ahoier wrote: | Something I was thinking, would be to have an alternative method for bundling the messages, especially for gspamcop, in which spamcop states (somewhere on their site....) they only take spam submissions that are less than ~40KB (example...I can't remember the exact value).
|
Believe it or not but I still have both emails where you requested those features, they're not ignored, just in the queue 
I'll get to them and inform you when I do.
wal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rainwolf
Sergeant
Joined: May 18, 2006
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ahoier wrote: | Something I was thinking, would be to have an alternative method for bundling the messages, especially for gspamcop, in which spamcop states (somewhere on their site....) they only take spam submissions that are less than ~40KB (example...I can't remember the exact value).
|
Feeling the pressure and that my thesis cold wait another day I started to have a look at it, those limits are fine when it comes to messages smaller than 40kB, but what about single message that exceed that size, as that frequently happens with image/pdf spam?
Just discard those?
wal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ahoier
SIRT Handler
Joined: Jan 14, 2006
Posts: 1085
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
neat-o glad to see they are still on the radar :)
| rainwolf wrote: | but what about single message that exceed that size(40kB), as that frequently happens with image/pdf spam?
Just discard those? |
Send those messages alone, as a single-message/forward, containing only one attachment, the 40kB+ message.
When it comes down to the SpamCop parser, I'm thinking it "should" simply "truncate" part of the message (trim the ending a bit, leaving a complete header, and partial body).
Perhaps this could be put under a "test" - i.e.: compile a 40kB "test spam" and forward/attach it, and throw it at a submit.xxx@spamcop reporting address and see how the parser "parses" the forwarded spam (if at all).
I know back when I looked up the limits, and asked at the forums, nobody really knew the answer, nor how the "overflow" (ie. a message with spam attachments being over 40kB) - nobody seemed to know (or could/would tell me anyways) what happens to the "overflow" - whether it is simply sent to the "bit bucket", or if the "limit" is really no "limit" - but more of a "rule" to put spam submission-size into perspective so as not to be bombarded with 150KB spam files, etc :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rainwolf
Sergeant
Joined: May 18, 2006
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ahoier wrote: | neat-o glad to see they are still on the radar
|
gspamcop is updated to your suggestions, get your copy today!
wal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nreiter
Trooper
Joined: Nov 29, 2004
Posts: 13
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The new Advanced IMAP Controls from Google labs breaks the gknujon script if you turn off any folders in IMAP. The statement:
if mb_names == ['All Mail', 'Drafts', 'Sent Mail', 'Spam', 'Starred', 'Trash']:
will not include and folders turned off and so fails. It's possible to turn off any or all of those folders with the new feature. For example, if I turn off the 'All Mail' and Spam folders in IMAP, the script fails with this:
Language is unknown and unsupported. Please send the authors this message and th
e following text. If possible, please include a translation.
['Drafts', 'Sent Mail', 'Starred', 'Trash']
_________________
-- Ned --
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rainwolf
Sergeant
Joined: May 18, 2006
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nreiter wrote: | The new Advanced IMAP Controls from Google labs breaks the gknujon script if you turn off any folders in IMAP. The statement:
if mb_names == ['All Mail', 'Drafts', 'Sent Mail', 'Spam', 'Starred', 'Trash']:
will not include and folders turned off and so fails. |
Done, feed me back.
I also put in a feature that switches to webmail-based reporting if your network (like my uni-network does) blocks outgoing smtp connections. Get it while it's HOT!
have fun,
wal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nreiter
Trooper
Joined: Nov 29, 2004
Posts: 13
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
With the new version I get these errors:
D:\Security\StandAlone_gKnujOn>gknujon.bat
D:\Security\StandAlone_gKnujOn>echo off
This is StandAlone_gKnujOn, version 20081013
Login successful - nreiter@gmail.com logged in
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "StandAlone_gKnujOn.py", line 382, in <module>
File "imaplib.pyo", line 621, in search
File "imaplib.pyo", line 1055, in _simple_command
File "imaplib.pyo", line 815, in _command
imaplib.error: command SEARCH illegal in state AUTH
D:\Security\StandAlone_gKnujOn\bin>
_________________
-- Ned --
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nreiter
Trooper
Joined: Nov 29, 2004
Posts: 13
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is with the Trash and Spam folders turned off in iMap. With all folders on, the script works correctly.
_________________
-- Ned --
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rainwolf
Sergeant
Joined: May 18, 2006
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nreiter wrote: | | This is with the Trash and Spam folders turned off in iMap. With all folders on, the script works correctly. |
welllllll, the script collects your spam from the spam-folder, submits it in a report that ends up in the sent mail folder, and usually moves reports and spam to the trash folder. I can see why spam needs to be enabled. You can "not move spam and sent reports to the trash after processing" and disable the trash folder. But in order to avoid that error I 'd have to reimplement web-based access to gmail and the reason we stepped away from that is that gmail kept changing its web-interface and that the libgmail package didn't always keep up, even now it seems flakey.
You see?
wal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
|
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Login to check your private messages
Login
