edit 72.

There are only two possibilities:

1. God is the inverse of the Fine-Structure constant (Planck's constant) or Alpha.

therefore,
a(with the approximate value)=a(infinity)=cos(pi/137)/137

resultant: the connection with alpha and pi:
a(n1,n2)=n2cos(pi/n1)tan(pi/(n1xn2))/pi

where

the fine structure constant is generally, alpha with no subscript.... this is the special case, n1=137 with n2 =29,

a=a(137,29)=29cos(pi/137)tan(pi/137x29))/pi=0.00729735253186... .

These are the formulaic evidences - or the beginnings of them for the RAYS you posit. Rather, the inverse of your uncertainty principle!

Positing God's nature is unique among existential assertions. The quickest way to point out that uniqueness is to call attention to the fact that, onthe one hand, inferring God's nature is like inferring the real nature of certain nuclear particles or black holes, and in these cases we are concerned with the real nature of somethingcorresponding to a theoretical construct that we have formed in order to hold the object in mind. The entity in question is not directly observable by us. In both cases, Ockham's Rule (http://www.ida.liu.se/~rosgr/ockhamrazor.html) governs the inference.

We are not justified in positing a certain type of elementary particle unless asserting its nature or even its existence is indespensable for the explanation of experimentally observed phenomena. We are not justified in positing the nature of God, unless affirming God's nature is indespensable for the explanation of...of what?

That question calls attention at once to a fuindamental difference between inferring the existence or nature of a certain type of nuclear particle and inferring the nature of God. In the latter case, it is not experimentally observed phenomena that calls for explanation, but rather the existence and nature of individual things which are part of the cosmos or the very nature of the cosmos as a whole.

There are other differences as well. In nuclear physics, the point of departure is usually in some experimentally observed phenomenon that is novel. Its novelty calls for a new theoretical construct, as in the notion of your "rays" devised to explain the theoretical data. If the explanation succeeds, scientists are justified in affirming the existence and nature in reality of entities corresponding to the class of objects they have in mind. In theology, we begin with the theoretical construct which is our definite description of God, and only then do we ask whether we have grounds fopr inferring that something corresponding to that theoretical consttruct exists in reality.

It is commonly held that only propositions that can be falsified by empirical evidence are empirical propositions. The proposition "God's nature is..." cannot be falsified by the discovery of any facts not already known to us. It is therefore, not an empirical proposition. The very nature of God, being ostensibly trans-dimensional is unfathomable within the strictures of our three-dimensional understanding. Not to say that God is restricted to dimensionality, only that our awareness that multidimensionality is a formulaic process by which we can grasp an otherwise arcane concept, gives humanity a guage to imagine the infinite qualities of the Godhead.

You are right-on when you imagine the counter-balances of existence. The polarizing effects of action-reaction tend to necessitate an element of the unknown...

2. (Implied)

A ray, according to yes, is an active process, therefore, it can have an endpoint. This endpoint is travelling, however, so the two, or infinite ray 'points' remain flat and linear unless acted upon by an - action. This action creates the 'triangle', assuming that the action doesn't take placealong a line which would negate the effect of it being a ray and it would be something else. A ray must "spread". These are three-dimensional processes, and in fact, the principles of three dimensional processes.

The 'unknown' element has a bridge with transdimensionality (formulaically speaking) mystics refer this as, "The God particle" the Spirit world, the unknown, but science refers to it as "alpha" or 1/137.
More a symbol of the unknown "glue" that ties together "spirit" and "Matter" than an actual concrete formula.