| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
zekeblue
Trooper

 Joined: May 17, 2006 Posts: 20 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 6:47 pm Post subject: Mailwasher - option to hide blacklisted mails from view |
|
|
It seems like a logical option for blacklisted mails is omitted. We can mark for deletion, delete after processing, delete immediately. But there is no option to hide the email like there is for the friends list. I don't automatically add deleted mails to my blacklist, so am doing automatic deletion. I'd rather be conservative and do that after processing, but don't want them in my visible mails for the first look at things.
Thanks! _________________ ........Zeke
Mozy Home - 2GB of free online Backup!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Takfuji
Lieutenant

 Joined: Mar 27, 2004 Posts: 204 Location: Japan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BuckeyeBasser
SRT Trainee
 Premium Member
 Joined: May 01, 2006 Posts: 692 Location: Central Ohio, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
What good would hiding them do? The regular mail client is going to download them if they are not deleted.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zekeblue
Trooper

 Joined: May 17, 2006 Posts: 20 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BuckeyeBasser wrote: | | What good would hiding them do? The regular mail client is going to download them if they are not deleted. |
Wouldn't they be deleted when processed like other filtered mail? _________________ ........Zeke
Mozy Home - 2GB of free online Backup!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BuckeyeBasser
SRT Trainee
 Premium Member
 Joined: May 01, 2006 Posts: 692 Location: Central Ohio, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I'd rather be conservative and do that after processing, but don't want them in my visible mails for the first look at things. |
If you are going to delete them without looking there is no appreciable difference from auto delete. I misunderstood your intent. Sorry!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Takfuji
Lieutenant

 Joined: Mar 27, 2004 Posts: 204 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
>What good would hiding them do?
If you have 200 mails in the list, you may want to hide
sure items to check gray ones easily.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AlphaCentauri
SIRT Handler Premium Member
 Joined: Nov 20, 2003 Posts: 2895
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Takfuji wrote: | >What good would hiding them do?
If you have 200 mails in the list, you may want to hide
sure items to check gray ones easily. |
Just click on the heading of the column, and they will all be sorted off by themselves.
But how many blacklisted emails do you have? All the spam has fake return addresses. (Mostly they are using our addresses in the "from" to annoy us with the bounces. If you blacklist those senders you're only blacklisting your fellow anti-spammers.) So the blacklist function is only useful for email from legitimate companies who won't unsubscribe you or real people you know who won't stop emailing you. Most of us don't bother with the blacklist any more, so there isn't a lot of call for any refinement of the function.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Takfuji
Lieutenant

 Joined: Mar 27, 2004 Posts: 204 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
>Just click on the heading of the column, and they will
>all be sorted off by themselves.
Aha!, good idea.
>But how many blacklisted emails do you have?
There are plenty. I blacklist *@*.cn for example.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AlphaCentauri
SIRT Handler Premium Member
 Joined: Nov 20, 2003 Posts: 2895
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
But the spam that actually comes from china would likely not have that in the fake "from" address.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Takfuji
Lieutenant

 Joined: Mar 27, 2004 Posts: 204 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, you are right. There also are many which has .cn, too. .br, .kr, ro and .hk as well.
The *@netzero.com shares about 10-20% recently.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|