That would be handy, I could use it for my spamcop report filter.

I just realized it's not so much for the Junk Mail statistics screen I want this, but more for the History part (Email Received & Filtered). I really have no clue at the moment how much *real* spam I receive, due to my (very effective) Bounces filter. All hits to this filter will get flagged as spam, but in essence isn't real spam (although this is debatable)

bounces_filter2.png
Description:
Filesize:	29.28 KB
Viewed:	37 Time(s)

What about an option to change the default font in Mailwasher Pro, for those of us who have trouble reading?

Ahem.

The font is fine as it stands AFAIC! I trust that the font can be changed back?

My Suggestions Are:

1) Change The Size Of The Toolbar Icons For Mailwasher Pro 5.3 So They are smaller, maybe around the size that Outlook Express 6 are, not too large and not too small, The Size that the icons are now takes up a lot of space, removing the words reduces the size but then you need to know what the icons are, Or Maybe A Option to choose from 2 or 3 different sizes

2) Ability to lock each pane after re-sizing as if you re-size now, it doesn't seem to want to stay re-sized. maybe a option to set at a fixed size you input

3) A Update Button would be great to check for new updates to the program

4) Ability To Block Spam Using IP Addresses For spammers that Forge Or Change their email addresses Often, Maybe Blocking Using IP Addresses could be another way to help

You can already block spam by IP addresses using filters. Which is exactly what a lot of ISP's do. So spammers have gotten around that by exploiting unsecure computers on otherwise vigilant networks. If you check the SpamCop statistics, very few of the IP addresses they have blocked have been there for more than a few hours. Once the ISP is notified, it shuts them down, and the spammer moves elsewhere. It isn't practical to have MWP go through a list of all the IP numbers usable by unsecure computers. That's what blocklists like SORBS do for you already with less processing time for your computer. But you'll find a lot of false positives, which is why SORBS is of limited use.

I was looking at my email filters recently (I use very simple filters, mostly just domains or suffixes, occasional wildcards, nothing too fancy). I have a few of them, named fairly self-explanatory names like “Delete and hide from view 01” (through to “10”), or “Friends – mark for deletion 01” and so on.

Quite a few of them have fairly random-looking addresses, with not a lot to identify the address (or sender) they actually refer to. Would it be possible to add a short ‘free text field’ next to the third column in the filters, in which we could enter an optional short descriptor for any we wanted to identify more readily?

Also: Could it be possible to add a 'delete selected line of the filter' option?
Most of my filters end up having all 10 rule boxes filled. I've recently had the situation where I had made a mistake in one of the rule boxes (put someone's email address that I didn't actually want to block or delete ), and had to re-do the rest of filter from that part on.