CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

$9736.22 of $21422.68
left sidedonated so farneed $11686.46 donated to reach our goalright side, our goal
Help CastleCops serve the community on new servers, Donate Here to reach our goal.

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
Survey
spacer
Was 2007 a good year?

Yes it was a wonderful year
Yes, but there is always room for improvement
Status quo
It was a challenge
Other (leave comment)



Results
Polls

Votes: 949
Comments: 28
block bottom
spacer spacer

Enhancements We Want in 5.4
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic       All -> FavForums -> Product Suggestions [del.icio.us!] [digg it!] [reddit!]
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bill_Bright

General
General
Premium Member

Joined: Jan 16, 2004
Posts: 8962
Location: Nebraska, USA
MVP Premium

PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 9:36 pm    Post subject: Enhancements We Want in 5.4
Reply with quote

Attention everyone who posted suggestions in Enhancements We Want in 5.3, please review and consolidate all those suggestions that didn't quite make it into 5.3 here. Wink

Attention SH and RD - Item 6 below did not get put in as per here and here - this one is important.

    1. For My Filters, I would like to see an option to "Mark the email for reporting". I find it confusing that there is no such option when there is an option to "Disable Reporting".

    2. Auto mark trash can for learning when filters or spam tools tag an email as spam (see screen shot below Item 5)

    3. Provide option to re-label the columns on the message page so, for example, I can rename the SpamCop to SC so resized columns fits the size of the check-box and you don't end up with a label that says "Sp..." - or the Learning label saying "Lear..." (see screen shot below Item 5)

    4. Provide option to edit the "Status" label for the Origin of Spam tools so the status label will fit in resized columns eliminating need to hover (which works intermittently) to see what's happening. For example, spam tagged by Spamhaus or SpamCop both begin with "Origin blacklisted by Spam..." - I would like to rename to RBL-SH or RBL-SC (see screen shot below Item 5)

    5. Fix background color bug for Learning filter. If you uncheck the Color the entire row box, the background of the Learning filter box remains the last selected color (see screen shot below)
image
    6. The documentation misrepresents the restore capabilities, one, and two, it does not properly warn users of the restore limitations. Therefore, users may easily (and often do) think they should be able to fully restore an email.

      a. Edit: Completed - The Program Help file HAS been changed to clearly and properly reflect the capabilities and limitations of the Delete and Restore functions.

      b. Tools, Options, Summary tab, Recycle Bin description needs to be changed to reflect the Restore Email function's limitations.

      c. Folks don't read help files. Therefore, the MW application itself needs to educate the user and should have a "default on" pop up that warns users with an "Are you sure?" type notice that again says, "If you restore a deleted email, the restored email will only display as many lines as you have chosen with the spam throttle."

      d. And of course, a check box for "Do not show this warning again" for seasoned users.


Edit - 6a changed to reflect correct status. 6b changed for minor edit


_________________
image Bill, AFE7Ret
Freedom is NOT Free!

image


Last edited by Bill_Bright on Wed May 24, 2006 3:46 am, edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Toblerone

Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Premium Member

Joined: Mar 31, 2006
Posts: 290
Location: Spain
Premium

PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 10:43 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I agree to all requests made by Bill_Bright, and I will slightly modify some and add other: Wink

Quote:
2. Auto mark (better make this an option) the trash can for learning when filters or spam tools -including the blacklist- tag an email as spam (see screen shot below Item 5)

7. Provide the option for customize the background colors (others than green and red shades) depending of the filters (for example, I would like to put a yellow background in the messages catched for "xyz" filter).


_________________
Toblerone, the chocolate with teeth
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
stan_qaz

Premium Member


Joined: Mar 31, 2003
Posts: 10626

Premium

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 12:13 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

A test button for the SMTP server so the folks having problems could see/post a quick log of a connection test.

A test button for DNSBL servers so you could make sure your choice was entered correctly and was working. Maybe an auto-trim of any leading/trailing spaces entered too.

The check-mail button to reset the mail checking counter so it waited your desired time before doing another check if you click it manually.

A statistics button up next to the Spam Tools button on the main tool area.

All of the bouncing options in the menus and dialogs disabled or better hidden if you don't have bouncing enabled.

The error warning triangle made larger and moved to the toolbar where it would be more obvious.

Visible labels, not just tool-tips for the normal/source view buttons. Making them be sticky between messages would also be nice.

A label on/near the DNSBL cancel button and progress bar saying Source of Spam.

An instantly appearing "I'm shutting down" popup box when you close MW so the shutdown delay doesn't make you think you didn't click the right spot.

I'd like the user having an option on when MW beeps for new mail: any mail or only good mail.

Add SURBL checking http://www.surbl.org/ SURBLs differ from most other RBLs in that they're used to detect spam based on message body URIs (usually web sites). Unlike most other RBLs, SURBLs are not used to block spam senders. Instead they allow you to block messages that have spam hosts which are mentioned in message bodies.

I'd like to see SPF checking added to MW, I just loaded the SPF check extension to Thunderbird and it is doing a great job of identifying bogus messages.

The outgoing e-mail address section of the account setup made a bit clearer and moved out of the bounce section. I think this is on the programmers to do list already.

The ability to set the SMTP server for each type of reporting so you could send reports directly to the destination server rather than going through your ISP's smtp servers.


_________________
Questions? Try the wiki
http://wiki.castlecops.com/MailWasher_Pro
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
rusticdog

Site Moderator
Premium Member

Joined: Aug 12, 2002
Posts: 5850
Location: New_Zealand
Blue Security Firetrust Moderators Premium

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 1:05 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

*tag*


_________________
I wish my lawn was emo, then it would cut itself
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
sighthound

Firetrust Host
Firetrust Host
Premium Member

Joined: Feb 04, 2003
Posts: 799

Firetrust Premium

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 2:51 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Quote:
a. The Program Help file needs to be changed to clearly and properly reflect the capabilities and limitations of the Delete and Restore functions. It only mentions that limitation under Setting Up Options, General Settings, Spam Throttle - that is not sufficient.


I altered the Help file that was packaged with 5.3 (w/o BF) and under Using MailWasher Pro > How to restore a deleted email.....
I added this :
MailWasher Pro will only restore as many lines of the email as set by your spam throttle settings. You can alter the spam throttle here: Tools > Options > General.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
Bill_Bright

General
General
Premium Member

Joined: Jan 16, 2004
Posts: 8962
Location: Nebraska, USA
MVP Premium

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 3:37 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

sighthound wrote:
Quote:
a. The Program Help file needs to be changed to clearly and properly reflect the capabilities and limitations of the Delete and Restore functions. It only mentions that limitation under Setting Up Options, General Settings, Spam Throttle - that is not sufficient.


I altered the Help file that was packaged with 5.3 (w/o BF) and under Using MailWasher Pro > How to restore a deleted email.....
I added this :
MailWasher Pro will only restore as many lines of the email as set by your spam throttle settings. You can alter the spam throttle here: Tools > Options > General.
Embarassed My mistake! When I didn't see it under Tools, Option Summary (6b above), I didn't think it was done. Sorry SH and thanks.


_________________
image Bill, AFE7Ret
Freedom is NOT Free!

image
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
sighthound

Firetrust Host
Firetrust Host
Premium Member

Joined: Feb 04, 2003
Posts: 799

Firetrust Premium

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 3:57 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

No worries Smile

Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
Toblerone

Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Premium Member

Joined: Mar 31, 2006
Posts: 290
Location: Spain
Premium

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 7:27 am    Post subject: Another one:
Reply with quote

It would be of use to have the option for a filter to override other spam tools. I have a filter named "Joe-Jobs" for catching all mails that show spoofed "From" header with addresses under my domain. I intend use it for make a "special" treatment of this type of spam, but FirstAlert annoyingly takes over it. Rolling Eyes

Ah, and add me to this one too:

stan_qaz wrote:
A statistics button up next to the Spam Tools button on the main tool area.


_________________
Toblerone, the chocolate with teeth
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Ikeb

Special Response Team
Forums Admin

Joined: Apr 20, 2003
Posts: 16515

Forums Admin Moderators MVP Premium SRT Team CC Committee Team F@H

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 5:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Another one:
Reply with quote

Toblerone wrote:
It would be of use to have the option for a filter to override other spam tools. I have a filter named "Joe-Jobs" for catching all mails that show spoofed "From" header with addresses under my domain. I intend use it for make a "special" treatment of this type of spam, but FirstAlert annoyingly takes over it. Rolling Eyes

This capability has been provided for as long as I've used MWP. See What_is_the_priority_sequence_for_spam_tools? for details.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Toblerone

Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Premium Member

Joined: Mar 31, 2006
Posts: 290
Location: Spain
Premium

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 9:19 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Well, after checking this by PM with Ikeb (thanks! Wink ) we have concluded that you can make a filter to override both friends list and FirstAlert, but not only FA, that is what I intend to do.

So I stand asking for this enhancement: to provide a way for filters taking precedence over FirstAlert or the other spam tools, while still staying below the friends list. Wink


_________________
Toblerone, the chocolate with teeth
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Toblerone

Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Premium Member

Joined: Mar 31, 2006
Posts: 290
Location: Spain
Premium

PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 9:29 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I'm asking myself if it would be interesting to mimic Thunderbird and include the options to "Use TLS" and/or "Use TLS (if available)" for POP3 & SMTP.

It seems that TLS is going to replace SSL so...


_________________
Toblerone, the chocolate with teeth
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Ikeb

Special Response Team
Forums Admin

Joined: Apr 20, 2003
Posts: 16515

Forums Admin Moderators MVP Premium SRT Team CC Committee Team F@H

PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 3:41 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Toblerone wrote:
Well, after checking this by PM with Ikeb (thanks! Wink ) we have concluded that you can make a filter to override both friends list and FirstAlert, but not only FA, that is what I intend to do.

So I stand asking for this enhancement: to provide a way for filters taking precedence over FirstAlert or the other spam tools, while still staying below the friends list. Wink

IMO, this isn't necessary. Certainly I can see no need to have this capability on a filter by filter basis. I can see a big confusion factor creeping in for many users who are already confused by marginal features. If anything, perhaps such an override could be set globally.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
AlphaCentauri

SIRT Handler
Premium Member

Joined: Nov 20, 2003
Posts: 2763

Premium

PostPosted: Sat May 27, 2006 2:31 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I would like a feature that would slow the sending of reports to spamcop. If I have a lot of spam, as I have since the BF debacle, some of it gets dumped by my ISP as it will not allow that many emails at a time. I don't know if MWP is supposed to be able to tell that, but since my Norton Antivirus is the last program handling the emails before they leave, that is the one that tells me the emails were refused -- and leaves me no way of re-trying.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
stan_qaz

Premium Member


Joined: Mar 31, 2003
Posts: 10626

Premium

PostPosted: Sat May 27, 2006 5:37 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I've been using a local smtp server for spam submission and it is working well, connects directly from my computer to the desitination SMTP server so my ISP is left out of the loop.

The two I've tested are in a sticky in the general forum. CastleCops Link/t151972-Fix_ISP_Wont_Send_Spam_Reports.html


_________________
Questions? Try the wiki
http://wiki.castlecops.com/MailWasher_Pro
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
MrBill

Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Premium Member

Joined: Apr 05, 2003
Posts: 216
Location: USA
Premium

PostPosted: Sat May 27, 2006 6:59 pm    Post subject: SPF?
Reply with quote

Quote:
I've been using a local smtp server for spam submission and it is working well, connects directly from my computer to the desitination SMTP server so my ISP is left out of the loop.


Did you add it to your domain's SPF record? I'm curious, because at some point I hope to get my ISP to add SPF to my domain. If I want to use a local SMTP server, I assume I would need to get them to include my local host (not a fixed IP) - otherwise my mail would generate a FAIL result for an SPF query.


_________________
--
Bill
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic       All -> FavForums -> Product Suggestions All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Quick Reply:
Username: 

Quote the last message
Attach signature (signatures can be changed in profile)
 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
spacer spacer