CastleCops® KPF ruined after Sunbelt acquisition

Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

	Donation/Premium

	Donations. Become Premium Today!

	Security Central

	· Home · PIRT/Fried Phish · MIRT · SIRT · Deutsch · Wiki · Newsletter · O16/ActiveX · CLSID List · Contest2007 · Downloads · Feedback (send) · Forums · HijackThis · Hijacktrend · LSPs · My Downloads · O18 · O20 · O21 · O22 · O23 · O9 · Premium · Private Messages · Proxomitron · Reviews · Search · StartupList · Stories Archive · Submit News · WsIRT · Your Account · Acceptable Use Policy

Forum FAQ

Usergroups

Profile

Select FavForums

KPF ruined after Sunbelt acquisition

All -> FavForums -> Sunbelt KerioPF

[del.icio.us!] [digg it!] [reddit!]

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

IP: 87.10.*.*

Guest

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 8:18 am Post subject: KPF ruined after Sunbelt acquisition

KPF ruined after Sunbelt acquisition

Graham1

Captain
Captain

Joined: Dec 21, 2005
Posts: 340

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 12:07 pm Post subject:

I don't think that it's all that bad , although I'm not keen on having Internet Explorer and Activesync added as permanent application rules. Were these rules only added because "alot" of users have reported problems with these applications? If this is the case, can we expect other applications added to this list in the near future?

MarkSB

Guest
IP: 80.229.*.*

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:51 pm Post subject:

Graham1 wrote:

Were these rules only added because "alot" of users have reported problems with these applications?

If this is the case by all means include them as default, but at least allow intelligent users to remove them! I hate being dictated to and treated as a child by developers.

Oldfrog

Special Response Team

Joined: Jun 27, 2004
Posts: 8576
Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 4:10 pm Post subject:

Quote:

If this is the case by all means include them as default, but at least allow intelligent users to remove them! I hate being dictated to and treated as a child by developers.

Agreed! Both NIS and ZA have options to disable automatic application configuration. I would like to see that in S/K as well.

_________________

MS MVP Security 2006-2008

Graham1

Captain
Captain

Joined: Dec 21, 2005
Posts: 340

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 4:31 pm Post subject:

MarkSB wrote:

Graham1 wrote:

Were these rules only added because "alot" of users have reported problems with these applications?

If this is the case by all means include them as default, but at least allow intelligent users to remove them! I hate being dictated to and treated as a child by developers.

Better still, leave them out and add something in the knowledgebase.

Smile

Spacemarine

Guest
IP: 84.134.*.*

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 9:46 pm Post subject:

Yes, let INTELLIGENT users remove these entries, please. No need for prohibiting the removal of these entries. I mean, come on, I don't have a handheld / portable WinCE PC, so why not allow me to remove these superfluous entries ? Cheers! Spacemarine

	All -> FavForums -> Sunbelt KerioPF	All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


	2002-2008 � Computer Cops LLC dba CastleCops®. All rights reserved. Acceptable Use Policy. Use signifies your agreement. 137ppm 0.190s (0.035s) Making cybercriminals unhappy since 2002*