Team CastleCops offers a diverse array of research projects in which you can choose to participate. Participation requires the investment of your computational resources, and the selection of a particular research project is best made by logical, objective evaluation of that research project. This is far from a trivial endeavor. Based upon a career as a research scientist, I have collected a few generic questions that you might ask to help you select reputable and sound research projects. While these questions cannot replace a detailed examination of the science, they are useful indicators of an ethical, high quality project.
Consider the stated objectives of the research project.
Are they explicitly articulated? Do they appear to be reasonable, feasible, and achievable? Skepticism is healthy.
Explore beneath the surface. Consider the example of a project providing the rationale that it contributes to advances in medical science. Any such project can be logically expected to involve active, formal collaborations with medical research institutions. Those collaborations should be identified explicitly, and you should evaluate their legitimacy as you would that of the parent project.
Consider the source of funding that financially supports the project.
Highly reputable funding sources demand a rigorous review of all proposed research prior to awarding funding. This process of peer review typically involves anonymous scrutiny of a proposal by the researcher’s colleagues and competitors. In the United States, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) are unquestionably the most highly regarded funding sources for fundamental research.
Consider the stature of the institutions conducting the research.
Highly regarded universities and research institutions have excellent reputations for good reason.
Consider the historical track record and reputation of the Principal Investigator (Lead Scientist) of the project.
The website for a specific project should provide, or give links to basic background information on the Principal Investigator.
Consider whether the results of the project will be published openly within the peer reviewed literature, or withheld for a restricted audience.
Consider whether the research is being conducted as a for-profit, or not-for-profit activity.
Assuming that a given research project appears reputable and sound, your selection then becomes a question of personal interest and personal choice.
Finally, I would urge that you keep in active contact with any research project that you have selected. Follow how your contributions are being used, learn, and share in the sheer joy of the pursuit of knowledge and understanding.
|