CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
spacer spacer

The American Crisis
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked you cannot edit posts or make replies       All -> FavForums -> Politics [del.icio.us!] [digg it!] [reddit!]
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BigFelix
Warnings : 2

Captain
Captain
Premium Member

Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Posts: 506
Location: San Diego
Premium

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am    Post subject: The American Crisis
Reply with quote

In The American Crisis Thomas Paine wrote:

THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated.

Although I was spared, during the Viet Nam War many uniformed servicemen were called "baby killers" and spat upon by a certain segment of our population. To clean this stain from themselves, this segment now makes sure that it shouts "Support Our Troops" while doing exactly the opposite. It still spits, but sans saliva. This segment is the far left. It now spouts its usual populist drivel, claiming that it, and only it, has the answer to each and every problem. Beware: the idiot--yes, idiot--Jimmy Carter exists in a being we know as Barack Obama. One pussycat's opinion. And this cat is a registered Independent, a self-proclaimed "Militant Moderate" who thinks for himself and owes not a shred of allegiance to any party line or ideology. So sue me.

Felix has spoken.


_________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
    Bertrand Russell
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email
alanstancliff

Captain
Captain
Premium Member

Joined: May 02, 2006
Posts: 675

Premium

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 1:49 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Hi Felix,

I'm curious about something. Are you the kind of "militant moderate" who thinks criticism or opposition to the war or US foreign policy is treason? Morally suspect? And what the hell do you mean by "militant moderate." It kind of sounds like an oxymoron to me, a bit like "alone together," "jumbo shrimp," or "benign neglect."

image

I spent a large part of the Vietnam war working with marines and naval personnel. Most of them were not too thrilled about the war. Down in San Diego, around 1969 and 1970, there were several very peaceful demonstrations against the war, around 25,000 people. These demonstrations were led by a contingent of active-duty marines and another of active-duty sailors. There were around 500 of them.

Then there was a group, Vietnam Veterans Against The War. They still exist. You should check out their website. Here's how they quote Smedley Butler, a 2-time Medal of Honor winner and former Marine Corps Commandant:

Smedley Butler wrote:
"War is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes...How many millionaires ever shoulder a rifle?

"For a great many years as a soldier, I had the suspicion that war was a racket. Not until I retired did I fully realize it.

"I was," said Butler of his own role in Central American intervention, "nothing more than a gangster for Wall Street."

You think Smedley is morally stained?

image

Today, May 15, some Iraqi war veterans, organized by Iraqi Veterans Against The War, are testifying in front of congress in an event they are calling "Winter Soldiers On The Hill." If you click on that link, you can hear the testimony and read about this. You think these guys are traitors or sissies?

Before answering that last one, you might want to check out the impressive biographies of those who today are testifying against this war

How about this group of West Point graduates? Do you question their loyalty and honor?

Or can you picture these antiwar military service academy graduates spitting in the faces of returning veterans?

And these family members of the veterans, the husbands, wives, lovers, children, parents of our military in Iraq, do you think they are betraying the troops?
image
Don't worry about being sued. Last time I looked, making silly and inane statements is not a tort.

image


_________________
Regards,

Alan
My Web Site, Blog, Music, Art
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
hendomatic

PIRT Handler
Premium Member

Joined: Jan 27, 2007
Posts: 260

Phishing Squad Premium Team F@H

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 2:59 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Sorry Alan but If if many thousands of Americans and their allies had not died for the masses in WW2, I'd be calling you Herr Standcliff assuming our parents survived to bring us both into this world.

Not sure what antiwar people you reference, but they have no right to quote Smedley Butler. He was part of the greatest generation. The folks that truly saw the threat and sacrificed all to ensure the free world persisted. You would think the people you reference would have declared him insane for serving the military with such devotion an heroism as many tours of duty that he served.

He has the right to decry the military industrial complex for he saw it in action many times.

Perhaps a better context to understand his post-war braggadocio from a speech that is a little more expanded than your carefully selected lines. This was also prior to WW2:

Quote:


War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses.

I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we'll fight. The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag.

I wouldn't go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.

There isn't a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its "finger men" to point out enemies, its "muscle men" to destroy enemies, its "brain men" to plan war preparations, and a "Big Boss" Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.

It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty- three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.

I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.

I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.

During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.

Might be true in a large sense, but that was 60+ years ago. Perhaps had he survived to learn the final truths around WW2, his demeanor would be a bit tempered.


The fact that some enterprises thrive on war is a sad fact and the fact that there are corrupt people that thrive on war is also sad, but the fact that we have those industries that thrive during war is the reason that the US is technically superior in times of war.

If you need to wage war and win, you need those industries. Its the alternative to simply rationing supplies and commandeering industry as was done during WW2 to ensure technical victory.

The Vietnam War was a war with a good purpose, but fought without the heart to win. I have said several times, if you arent waging war to win, dont wage war.

I think you have demagogued the issue by trying to compare baby killers to the profiteers of war.

It will all come to be clear what war is about. Probably wont be next year, or even 10 years. It will be when the US has internally defeated itself to a self-declared 3rd world country and some crazy nation with nukes has the bawls to take us on.

Then it will be too late and a long chapter in history will close and another will start the cycle of survival all over again.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
BigFelix
Warnings : 2

Captain
Captain
Premium Member

Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Posts: 506
Location: San Diego
Premium

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 4:21 am    Post subject: Re: The American Crisis
Reply with quote

The Militantly Moderate BigFelix wrote:
... during the Viet Nam War many uniformed servicemen were called "baby killers" and spat upon by a certain segment of our population.

You conveniently forgot to address this statement. Do you deny it?

Nowhere did I even hint that opposition to any war or to any foreign policy was treason. Which of my statements say that?

I await your answers and am sure that they will be, for the most part, off-topic and peppered with lame wit designed to disparage. This is your modus operandi which serves only to elicit disrespect for yourself.


_________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
    Bertrand Russell
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email
alanstancliff

Captain
Captain
Premium Member

Joined: May 02, 2006
Posts: 675

Premium

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 8:27 am    Post subject: Re: The American Crisis
Reply with quote

Well Felix,

Here's how I interpreted your post:

You seemed to be saying that during the Vietnam war (were you around then?), antiwar protesters shamefully harassed returning veterans, and now those same antiwar activists want to cover that up. They claim to be supporting the troops, but how can they be supporting the troops when they are opposing the war. Examples of their obnoxious behavior is spitting in the face of returning GI's and calling them baby killers.

So, did I get it? Was that what you meant to say? Because that's the assumption I made about your post, and that was the assumption I am basing my answer upon. So if I am wrong, please explain.

It's true that you did not say anything about treason. Apparently, I read something into your post you did not intend to say, and I acknowledge I was wrong to assume that.


image

I attempted to show that the antiwar movement was not anti GI, and as a matter of fact, many GIs participated in it. There is a large and honorable history of GIs in the San Diego area, where you live, who participated in and organized against the war. Did you know that? As it happens, I lived in San Diego during part of that time, and I do remember.

A fellow who was around at that time, Chris Clarke, wrote an op-ed piece for Counterpunch, and he sums up what was my experience during the war. I'll put some of it at the end of this posting, because he really sums up what I remember about this baby-killer, spit-in-the-face crap.

image

What I do remember are things like the antiwar GI coffee houses. I remember performing my music for GI's in them. I also remember participating in a concert at El Toro Marine Corps event. I remember crying when GI's who were my friends, many of whom opposed the war but did their duty, were killed in that terrible conflict. I remember grieving when one GI I knew stepped on a mine and lost something no man wants to lose. I remember a GI who picked up a piece of booby trapped fruit in a store in Saigon and was blown to bits. All the Vietnamese knew it was there, but the American didn't. I remember guys who lost a foot after stepping on a panji stick. I remember guys being afraid of a little green snake called the "three step snake" because if you got bit, that's how many more steps you would take before you died. I even knew socialists who were drafted, went to Vietnam, and died there.

What I don't personally remember are any antiwar activists spitting at GIs and calling them baby killers, although I recall the accusation was frequently made. When and if that happened, it was very isolated and did not represent the views of those millions of Americans of all walks of life who participated in what was the largest, most broadly based antiwar movement in history, a movement that occurred during a shooting war.

What we were for was the immediate withdrawal of the troops from Vietnam. Other than that, we did not have a lot in common because this was a very broad-based movement that included many political tendencies from far left to very moderate, some who were pacifists and some who were not, religious groups, civic groups, and even a group called something like "Jocks Against The War." Believe it or not, we even had some Republicans, and there was an off-duty policeman who opposed the war openly and participated in the parade monitor committee to help us obtain police permits and organize safety and assistance for people who might faint, children who might get lost, etc.

image

In the early days of the antiwar movement in San Diego, there were 2 guys that attended one of our mass meetings, and they wanted to have some big demonstration against the military. Everybody else there was against it. Later on, it turned out they were infiltrators from one of the extreme right-wing groups, who often fed faulty information to the police about our activities. San Diego, as you may know, also has a long history of right-wing terrorist groups carrying on fire bombings and shootings and intimidation. They also specialized in crude and transparent attempts to infiltrate our antiwar groups and get us to do stupid things, and even illegal things.

These particular guys especially wanted big banners in a demonstration we were planning that would denounce the GIs as being "baby killers." We who opposed that argued that the GIs were not responsible for the war, many were against it, and many more could be won over to oppose it. We needed to treat them with respect. After all, the GIs were a cross section of America, except heavily weighted towards working class and minority.

I remember one activist had acid thrown in her face. Her husband's car had acid poured all over its interior. One activist had a pipe bomb placed in the kitchen

One of these terrorist groups called itself the "Secret Army Organization," but they had nothing to do with the Army. They did have plenty to do with the Nixon Whitehouse Plumbers and C Arnholt Smith, a crooked banker that owned a large part of San Diego. You can read about some of its terrorist activities, including attempts at mass murder, by clicking on this site, hosted at the University of California in San Diego.

Anyhow, here's part of Chris Clarke's essay, which can be read in full by clicking here

Chris Clarke wrote:

We Never Spit on Any Babykillers

But it's clear that's not what most people mean when they pledge their support to our troops. There's a certain mental shrug, an Altermanish "oh, well, our side lost, let's make the best of this war" fatalism that goes with the phrase that makes it clear people aren't talking about putting all the kids on troop transports and shipping them back to San Diego.

No, it would seem in fact that what people generally intend by the phrase is a defense against an old story told about those of us who opposed an earlier war now fading from the public consciousness. Thirty or so years ago, the story goes, poor beleaguered GIs returning from Vietnam were met with torrents of abuse from anti--war protesters. We called them "babykillers," we called them "Nazis," we spat on them, we contributed to the general sense of alienation that fostered the well known phenomenon of the Psychotic Vietnam Vet. If not for the antiwar movement, Vietnam vets would have folded neatly and unobtrusively back into society just as their Greatest Generation daddies did after Anzio.

Counterpunch readers are more likely than most to know that this story is at best, an ideologically--driven exaggeration of one or two unfortunate incidents. At worst, it's a damned lie.

In the 1960s and 70s, antiwar activists opened coffeehouses near military bases, to provide soldiers with troubled consciences places to spend a few off--duty hours in like--minded company. We harbored deserters and AWOLs. We wrote letters to GIs, sent them care packages, grieved over them when they joined the damnable body counts announced on the Five O'Clock Follies.

And -- not to put too fine a point on it -- antiwar activists also fought in the goddamned war.
...............................
That's not to say there weren't those who, for one reason or another, conflated their distaste for the war with their feelings for the grunts who fought it. There are morons in every movement, after all. And there were, in fact, national organizations that made habits of lambasting returning Vietnam vets, in some cases actually denying them membership or services regardless of the vets' personal views. (The VFW comes to mind, as does the VA.)

The fabled massive anti--war trashing of "our troops" never happened: it's nothing but a goddamned lie. Still, it's a convenient lie for those who want to cast opposition to this new war as treasonable, as somehow more deleterious to the average Specialist First Class than it was to ship him into combat in the first place.


image

BigFelix wrote:
I await your answers and am sure that they will be, for the most part, off-topic and peppered with lame wit designed to disparage. This is your modus operandi which serves only to elicit disrespect for yourself.

Well, I'll skip the humor. As I mentioned to k027, we leftists are noted for being humorless.

I trust this answer will be direct enough for you. In short--spitting on GIs and calling them babykillers is not what the antiwar movement was or is about.

Now, do me a favor, would you? Can you address the issue I brought up, which is why do you suppose that West Point graduates, veterans of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, and their families are so against this war? Have you looked at the links I provided? Could it be that you might be stereotyping antiwar Americans?

Oh, and what the hell is a "militant moderate"? I really want to know.


_________________
Regards,

Alan
My Web Site, Blog, Music, Art
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
alanstancliff

Captain
Captain
Premium Member

Joined: May 02, 2006
Posts: 675

Premium

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 8:42 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

One more thing Felix,

I really like that Bertrand Russell quote, and I have always admired his writing.

Did you know that he was responsible for the International War Crimes Tribunal? Here is what Wikipedia said about its origin:

Quote:
Representatives of 18 countries participated in the two sessions of this tribunal, formally calling itself the International War Crimes Tribunal. The tribunal committee consisted of 25 notable personages, predominantly from leftist peace organizations. Many of these individuals were winners of the Nobel Prize, Medals of Valor and awards of recognition in humanitarian and social fields. There was no direct representation of Vietnam or the United States on this 25 member panel, although a couple of members were American citizens.


Here's how Bertrand Russell justified this tribunal, which investigated whether war crimes were committed on either side during the Vietnam war:
Bertrand Russell wrote:
If certain acts and violations of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them. We are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.


You might want to do a bit of research into Russell's views on the Vietnam war, and also his views on Zionism, which you may also not like.

You won't find this on public broadcasting, by the way, so you might want to look elsewhere


_________________
Regards,

Alan
My Web Site, Blog, Music, Art
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
JoAnnCQ
Warnings : 2

Major
Major
Premium Member

Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Posts: 1274


PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 10:44 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

hendomatic wrote:

If you need to wage war and win, you need those industries. Its the alternative to simply rationing supplies and commandeering industry as was done during WW2 to ensure technical victory.

The Vietnam War was a war with a good purpose, but fought without the heart to win. I have said several times, if you arent waging war to win, dont wage war.

I think you have demagogued the issue by trying to compare baby killers to the profiteers of war.

It will all come to be clear what war is about. Probably wont be next year, or even 10 years. It will be when the US has internally defeated itself to a self-declared 3rd world country and some crazy nation with nukes has the bawls to take us on.

Then it will be too late and a long chapter in history will close and another will start the cycle of survival all over again.


Might Not there Be another Way? iiWii

just wondering,
luv/peace/compassion/understanding/sharing,
johand

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
BigFelix
Warnings : 2

Captain
Captain
Premium Member

Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Posts: 506
Location: San Diego
Premium

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 11:46 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Alan: You remind me of an automobile with a supercharged engine but which lacks a steering wheel. Your discussion is all over the place and lacks focus. The use of one person,the unknown Chris Clarke, as proof of your thesis is rather a joke and a pitiful display not at all befitting the intelligent man I thought you were. I served honorably in the Navy at Naval Air Station Anacostia (D.C.) and aboard the attack carrier USS Intrepid (CVA-11). I used my GI Bill at Texas where I witnessed the antics of SDS--Students for a Democratic (Communist!) Society. And thence off to UC Berkeley where I watched the loonies of the left causing grief, insult, and harm to whomever they could, whenever they could, wherever they could, and as much as they could. So, tell this Chris Clarke person to kiss my royal ... As to Bertrand Russell, I am well aware of his position on numerous of matters. And the quote is still spot on. Being anti-Israel is one of the left's favorite hobbies; yet another group irritated by those pesky Jews! I am generally pro-Israel but don't happen to be a Zionist (one Jew sending a second Jew to Israel with the money of yet a third). Always remember Abba Eban's view of the Palestinians: "They never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity." In a different thread I wrote of having a Palestinian Moslem girlfriend in Jerusalem who was rabidly pro-PLO. If Conrad Arnholt Smith, Richard Nixon, and the "plumbers" didn't require a few words, I would love to tell you all about "Militant Moderation." So, please try authoring a post that's shorter than an unfurled roll of paper towels. I do, however, give you kudos for always coloring within the lines.


_________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
    Bertrand Russell
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email
VastlyRight

Captain
Captain


Joined: Nov 21, 2006
Posts: 557
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 4:09 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

From the wikipedia

On Smedly Butler

Quote:
Between 1935 and 1937, he served as a spokesman for the American League Against War and Fascism (which some considered communist-dominated).[20]

On the The American League Against War and Fascism
Quote:
The American League Against War and Fascism was a Comintern affiliate organization formed in 1933 by CPUSA and pacifists united by their concern as Nazism and Fascism rose in Europe. It published "The FIGHT against War and Fascism" broadsheet.

Henry F. Ward, a Methodist minister and chairman of the American Civil Liberties Union, became chairman of the League. Communist publications were widely distributed throughout churches. It was a major campaign by the CPUSA to organize in churches and enlist members into the League.

Reverend Hermann F. Reissig of the League stated that church members had the duty "neither to commend nor to vindicate religious beliefs or organizations. Our function is to use religious forces in the defense of the masses of people."

The executive committee which did actually planning was known as the Natal Bureau. On 9 August 1935 the Bureau issued a plan targeting trade unions and religious groups for special attention. Roman Catholics were the first target. The plans targeted the International Association of Catholic Alumni, League of Catholic Men, Knights of Columbus, Catholic Association for International Peace, and various Catholic women's groups. Jewish religious, cultural, fraternal and Zionist groups also were listed as targets. Among Protestants, attention was to be given to the YMCA ministerial associations, local parishes, and adherents of the Lutheran and Reformed faiths, 'because of their German traditions and friendships.' "

By 1935 the League claimed membership of 3,291,906 Americans, which rose and to 7,836,691 by the outbreak of the European war in 1939. There were actual number of dues paying members was about 20,000. The League claimed 241 affiliated groups, eighty of them being in New York City.

In 1937 it became the American League for Peace and Democracy. Helen Silvermaster was associated with this group.[2]

The League dissolved after the 1939 signing of the Hitler-Stalin pact discouraged its non-communist members.[3] Its communist elements then influenced the founding of the American Peace Mobilization front.

On the Comintern
Quote:
The Comintern (Communist International, also known as the Third International) was an international Communist organization founded in Moscow in March 1919. The International intended to fight "by all available means, including armed force, for the overthrow of the international bourgeoisie and for the creation of an international Soviet republic as a transition stage to the complete abolition of the State."[1] The Comintern was founded after the dissolution of the Second International in 1916, following the 1915 Zimmerwald Conference in which Lenin had led the "Zimmerwald Left" against those who supported the "national union" governments in war with each other.

The Comintern held seven World Congresses, the first in March 1919 and the last in 1935. As of 1928 it was estimated that the organization had 583,105 members, excluding its Soviet membership.[2]

At the start of World War II, the Comintern supported a policy of non-intervention, arguing that this was an imperialist war between various national ruling classes, much as World War I had been. However, when the Soviet Union itself was invaded on June 22, 1941, during Operation Barbarossa, the Comintern switched its position to one of active support for the Allies. The Comintern was subsequently officially dissolved in 1943.


I submit that the the American League Against War and Fascism was in fact a creation and wholly owned subsidiary of the comintern and that Butler was at the very least a dupe. That he was a highly decorated Marine makes his service to that organization an all the more useful idiocy.
Lest we forget,Benedict Arnold was a gallant leader of the American revolution prior to his betrayal.
The purpose of the comintern and it's various front organizations was in fact the promotion of their communistic brand of fascism.It is said,by their fruits you shall know them.The murderous record of communist tyranny worldwide in the last century speaks for itself.


_________________
Personal freedom will never go out of style, and that's at the root of conservatism. There isn't a problem in the world that doesn't have freedom as its best start in solving it."
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
hendomatic

PIRT Handler
Premium Member

Joined: Jan 27, 2007
Posts: 260

Phishing Squad Premium Team F@H

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 6:19 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

JoAnnCQ wrote:
hendomatic wrote:

If you need to wage war and win, you need those industries. Its the alternative to simply rationing supplies and commandeering industry as was done during WW2 to ensure technical victory.

The Vietnam War was a war with a good purpose, but fought without the heart to win. I have said several times, if you arent waging war to win, dont wage war.

I think you have demagogued the issue by trying to compare baby killers to the profiteers of war.

It will all come to be clear what war is about. Probably wont be next year, or even 10 years. It will be when the US has internally defeated itself to a self-declared 3rd world country and some crazy nation with nukes has the bawls to take us on.

Then it will be too late and a long chapter in history will close and another will start the cycle of survival all over again.


Might Not there Be another Way? iiWii

just wondering,
luv/peace/compassion/understanding/sharing,
johand


I'm all ears. Please help me explore the possibilities.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
BigFelix
Warnings : 2

Captain
Captain
Premium Member

Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Posts: 506
Location: San Diego
Premium

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 8:20 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

P.J. O'Rourke: Give War a Chance.


_________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
    Bertrand Russell
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email
hendomatic

PIRT Handler
Premium Member

Joined: Jan 27, 2007
Posts: 260

Phishing Squad Premium Team F@H

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 8:33 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Shh.. no fair hinting....

Smile

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
JoAnnCQ
Warnings : 2

Major
Major
Premium Member

Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Posts: 1274


PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 2:51 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Hi HandyMan,

First it's the tongue twisters on the religionist forums & now this? & I thought it was Felix who was gonna quiz me? (& with me studying the Capitals of all the States too? - well at least that wasn't a waste of time)

hhhmmm ... well this changes everything.

Well I think You should give Yourself a Hand, or a round of applause, or even a pat on the back (if You like that sort of thing)

I must admit it was a nice touch using 1 of my favorite modi operandi (or modus operandus?) Y'know the 1 where you take a question & throw it back to the person asking the question? I do like that one.

I'm listening too. I like to explore & entertain possibilities.

bye.

luv/peace/piece/listening,
johand

(& thanks for the hint hint Felix)

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
hendomatic

PIRT Handler
Premium Member

Joined: Jan 27, 2007
Posts: 260

Phishing Squad Premium Team F@H

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 3:36 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

JoAnnCQ wrote:
Hi HandyMan,

First it's the tongue twisters on the religionist forums & now this? & I thought it was Felix who was gonna quiz me? (& with me studying the Capitals of all the States too? - well at least that wasn't a waste of time)

hhhmmm ... well this changes everything.

Well I think You should give Yourself a Hand, or a round of applause, or even a pat on the back (if You like that sort of thing)

I must admit it was a nice touch using 1 of my favorite modi operandi (or modus operandus?) Y'know the 1 where you take a question & throw it back to the person asking the question? I do like that one.

I'm listening too. I like to explore & entertain possibilities.

bye.

luv/peace/piece/listening,
johand

(& thanks for the hint hint Felix)


Ok, I've reached my limit.

I dont believe I've ever posted in any other open forum at CastleCops except here and Le Cachot. The rest of my posts are around the PIRT team and phishing remediation.

For the record here is a sorted list of the subjects of all my posts.

49 PIRT Fried Phish Reports
25 Politics
14 The Phishing Squad
10 All Star Staff
3 Phish Kits
2 Web Malware Links
2 SIRT Reports
1 To Do...
1 Premium Chat
1 Le Cachot
1 Happy Events
1 DDoS

As you can see I spend a fair bit more time posting in places other than politics and not in any religion forum.


Since you addressed me, I can only assume you're talking about my posts.

If you're going to maintain your rhetorical-no-value-add-posts-laced-with-LSD, I would just as soon you didnt post at all.

I'm glad it must make you feel good to label everything you talk about and slogan everything else but it adds precisely no value to the conversation.

Your inane posts are a clear signal of the problem in today's society. The inability or refusal to understand and seriously discuss the issues at hand.

Feel free to contribute in a valuable, material way. Otherwise, as Archie Bunker said, Stifle yourself.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
alanstancliff

Captain
Captain
Premium Member

Joined: May 02, 2006
Posts: 675

Premium

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:57 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

BigFelix wrote:
Alan: You remind me of an automobile with a supercharged engine but which lacks a steering wheel. Your discussion is all over the place and lacks focus. The use of one person,the unknown Chris Clarke, as proof of your thesis is rather a joke and a pitiful display not at all befitting the intelligent man I thought you were.

See? I warned you before about making unwarranted assumptions! Now aren't you sorry you said I was intelligent in public. Now have to eat crow? Let that be a lesson to you about jumping to conclusions based on incomplete evidence and first impressions, young man!

By the way, you missed my point, no doubt owing to my lack of focus and inability to speak plain English.

I did not have a "thesis." I did not attempt to "prove" anything.

You asked me point blank if it was not true that antiwar protesters spat in the faces of returning troops and called them baby killers. I said that this was not my experience and that I had no first-hand knowledge of it. However, I heard some pro-war types make this allegation, but I did not give it a lot of credence.

My opinion is that if any antiwar protesters called GIs baby killers or spat in their faces as they were coming home, it was an extremely isolated phenomenon. Otherwise, so many GIs would not have become involved in the antiwar movement. You might have noticed in your military experience that GIs generally are not motivated to support causes whose supporters call them names and spit in their faces. That, at least, was the impression I got from the Marines and sailors I worked with. But I can't prove it never happened, and if it did, I certainly think it was the wrong thing to do.

But what the hell do I know? Seeing as how I have a different opinion than you about things, we have prima facie evidence that I must be unintelligent and dull-witted. You're kind of new here, or you would have seen others around here came to this conclusion long ago. However, I can at least take consolation in the fact that you won't make the mistake of overestimating me again, being the quick and observant lad that you are, thank Goddess!

Moreover, several suits and congressional hearings established that government agents systematically infiltrated various left groups and attempted to get them involved in illegal, violent, and stupid activities, in large part to try to minimize and reverse the growing popular appeal of the antiwar movement.

I quoted Chris Clarke, not because he was some big national antiwar leader, but because his words summed up so beautifully what my experiences were.

If you want to read a really authoritative book on the history of the antiwar movement, check out the book called "Out Now: A Participant's Account of the Movement in the United States Against the Vietnam War" by Fred Halstead, whom I personally knew, and who was a WW II Navy veteran. I don't agree with every jot and tittle of Fred's well-documented and exhaustive history of that movement, but all-in-all, I think it is a remarkably good book.

BigFelix wrote:
I do, however, give you kudos for always coloring within the lines.
I'm a bit puzzled at this, although I accept your kudos. I thought my writing was unfocused. Must have strayed off the razor-sharp topic, somehow. What was it again? Oh, yes, "The American Crisis."

I'll have to try harder to remain on target, I guess.


_________________
Regards,

Alan
My Web Site, Blog, Music, Art
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked you cannot edit posts or make replies       All -> FavForums -> Politics All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 1 of 7

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
spacer spacer