| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
42unite
Corporal
Joined: May 09, 2004
Posts: 57
Location: USA
|
 Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 1:43 am Post subject: "TE: Kill" header filter |
|
|
Was looking through the config and saw this header filter in Sidki's newest 2008-01-02:
In = FALSE
Out = TRUE
Key = "TE: Kill 6.09.29 [sd] (d.0) (Out)"
The above three lines are all that's there.
I then looked back through old config versions and, in one that I'd dated 15 Oct 06 (and many previous versions), found this filter:
In = FALSE
Out = TRUE
Key = "TE: Kill while faking User-Agent 5.09.07 [sd] (d.0) (Out)"
URL = "$TST(keyword=*.f_ua_*)"
So somewhere in mid to late Oct 2006 the filter was modified.
Is the latest first version correct and functional?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ProxFox
Proxomitron Host
Joined: Nov 11, 2003
Posts: 940
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the three lines is correct and functional - simply axes the TE: header filter on all URL's...
and axes it whether or not it "contains" anything or not...
whereas "pragma" and "set-cookie" (directly above "te") axes only if "empty", but again does so on all URL's (no URL line in the filter)...
now, correct and funtional, yes... but "intentional" by sidki, not sure...
ps - good header filter resource: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
42unite
Corporal
Joined: May 09, 2004
Posts: 57
Location: USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ProxFox
Proxomitron Host
Joined: Nov 11, 2003
Posts: 940
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
have you found any sites that use "TE" in the header?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
whenever
Lieutenant
Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: 163
Location: China
|
| Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 2:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ProxFox wrote: | the three lines is correct and functional - simply axes the TE: header filter on all URL's...
and axes it whether or not it "contains" anything or not... |
According to the help file:
| Quote: |
To delete a header: include a matching expression, but leave the replacement text blank.
|
Shouldn't we use a "*" in the matching field?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ProxFox
Proxomitron Host
Joined: Nov 11, 2003
Posts: 940
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
good point...
but even the "original" filter in question didn't have a "match" line, so i guess i'm stumped...
is anyone finding any sites that even USE "TE:" ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ecli
Trooper
Joined: Dec 27, 2005
Posts: 17
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ProxFox wrote: | but even the "original" filter in question didn't have a "match" line
|
I'm confused too (I guess it's some UNDOCUMENTED feature!)
| ProxFox wrote: |
is anyone finding any sites that even USE "TE:" ? |
I believe "TE:" is a REQUEST header, Opera uses it:
| Code: | | TE: deflate, gzip, chunked, identity, trailers |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Login to check your private messages
Login
, I'll assume it to be accurate and leave it as is! 