| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
!claire
General
 Premium Member
 Joined: Apr 21, 2002 Posts: 8380
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mhe
Cadet

 Joined: Dec 02, 2003 Posts: 3 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow those apps are looking great, insane amount of possibilitys in both of them.
I`ll probably try both the NAT and the Packet filter app. Donīt really get why they separated the two? Im thinking most people could make use for both.
Looks extremely professional, no bloat like keiro, both apps are around 300kb.
If anybody is using any of them, please post comments!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stefan_R
Cadet

 Joined: Dec 03, 2003 Posts: 3 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@mhe,
"Donīt really get why they separated the two?"
To avoid confusion. NAT plays a purely networking role and the packet filter an access control one.
However - if both are installed they will be available from the same management console.
"no bloat like keiro"
Kerio is a personal firewall and a great one I believe. One of the reasons these type of apps tend to be "bloatware" is that they incorporate many useful features for the end-user such as privacy, application monitoring, etc. CHX-I is not a personal firewall therefore the comparison is unfair to Kerio.
Best Regards,
Stefan.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mhe
Cadet

 Joined: Dec 02, 2003 Posts: 3 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Kerio is a personal firewall and a great one I believe. One of the reasons these type of apps tend to be "bloatware" is that they incorporate many useful features for the end-user such as privacy, application monitoring, etc. CHX-I is not a personal firewall therefore the comparison is unfair to Kerio."
It slows down your LAN speed dramatically, to/from the computer acting router.
I`ve mailed them about this for years ago, when i was using winroute pro 3.X, and they still havent gotten it right with their newest most expensive enterprise solutions.
Thats the main reason i dont use it. But of course i could live without the new butt ugly interface, old 3-4.X interface is way better.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stefan_R
Cadet

 Joined: Dec 03, 2003 Posts: 3 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"It slows down your LAN speed dramatically, to/from the computer acting router. "
I didn't know that.
If you try CHX-I NAT let us know your opinions.
Best Regards,
Stefan.
(from IDRCI)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mhe
Cadet

 Joined: Dec 02, 2003 Posts: 3 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2003 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Stefan_R wrote: | "It slows down your LAN speed dramatically, to/from the computer acting router. "
I didn't know that.
If you try CHX-I NAT let us know your opinions.
Best Regards,
Stefan.
(from IDRCI) |
I installed both the packet filter and the NAT application. So far it seems solid.
I do however have a few things i need to get straight. And i feel it will be difficult explaining them in detail here. Stefan is it possible to talk to you through some sort of an instant messanger, irc/icq?
/mhe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phoenix22
Welcome back our old Site Admin Premium Member
 Joined: Mar 08, 2002 Posts: 4661 Location: APO SF96383
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2003 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
transcontinental used to work pretty cheaply.....in somebody's opinion _________________ 101st Abn Div. (AirAssault) "Rendezvous With Destiny!" "Night Stalkers/Phoenix Flight" For Buddy...who lived it! Whiskey for my men and beer for my horses! H.A.L.O!, 5th Grp., MACV-SOG, 160th AVN Grp., VFW
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stefan_R
Cadet

 Joined: Dec 03, 2003 Posts: 3 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2003 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
" Stefan is it possible to talk to you through some sort of an instant messanger, irc/icq?"
Just e-mail me (stef!idrci.net replace ! with @)
I'd be glad to answer any of your questions (technically related of course )
Best regards,
Stefan.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|